Operations research contribution to totally automated radiotherapy treatment planning: A noncoplanar beam angle and fluence map optimization engine based on optimization models and algorithms.

The planning of radiotherapy treatments is based on the use of mathematical optimization models and algorithms. A treatment plan will correspond to an admissible solution to a problem that is defined by the medical prescription. The medical prescription defines the constraints that have to be satisfied, and that are patient dependent. To find a treatment plan complying with all the defined constraints, an objective function is built, having a set of parameters that can be tuned. In the clinical practice, the objective function parameters are tuned through a trial-and-error procedure. One common way of defining this objective function is to consider as parameters weights that are related with the importance of the corresponding structures of interest (volumes to treat and organs to spare), as well as upper and lower bounds that are related with the constraints defined by the medical prescription. Some treatment options, like the set of irradiation directions (beam angles), are usually defined beforehand by the planner, considering previous experiences with similar cases. This trial-and-error process is lengthy, since it can take up to several hours to calculate an admissible treatment plan for a single patient. There have been some research efforts to automate the treatment planning procedure, releasing the planner for other important tasks in the radiotherapy treatment workflow and guaranteeing the consistent calculation of high-quality plans. In this work derivative-free optimization algorithms are integrated with fuzzy inference systems that automatically tune the objective function parameters so that an admissible solution is found. This fully automated approach was tested and assessed considering six head-and-neck cancer cases already treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology at Coimbra (IPOC). For the clinical cases tested, comparisons between different treatment plans clearly favor the proposed approach. For a similar tumor coverage, it was possible to improve the sparing of the spinal cord, brainstem and parotids. Automating radiotherapy treatment planning can contribute to improved treatment plans in a consistent way. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]