Back to Search Start Over

Recurrence risk in symptomatic intracranial stenosis treated medically in the real world.

Authors :
Yaghi, Shadi
Shu, Liqi
Goldstein, Eric D.
Chang, Allison
Kala, Narendra
Stretz, Christoph
Burton, Tina M.
Perelstein, Elizabeth
Furie, Karen
Jayaraman, Mahesh
Torabi, Radhmer
Moldovan, Krisztina
de Havenon, Adam
Khatri, Pooja
Gebregziabher, Mulugeta
Liebeskind, David S.
Prabhakaran, Shyam
Source :
Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases; Jun2023, Vol. 32 Issue 6, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

The risk of early recurrence in medically treated patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) may differ in clinical trials versus real-world settings. Delayed enrollment may contribute to lower event rates in ICAS trials. We aim to determine the 30-day recurrence risk in a real-world setting of symptomatic ICAS. We used a comprehensive stroke center stroke registry to identify hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke or TIA due to symptomatic 50–99% ICAS. The outcome was recurrent stroke within 30 days. We used adjusted Cox regression models to identify factors associated with increased recurrence risk. We also performed a comparison of 30-day recurrent stroke rates in real world cohorts and clinical trials. Among 131 hospitalizations with symptomatic 50-99% ICAS over 3 years, 80 hospitalizations of 74 patients (mean age 71.6 years, 55.41% men) met the inclusion criteria. Over 30 days, 20.6 % had recurrent stroke; 61.5% (8/13) occurred within first 7 days. The risk was higher in patients not receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (HR 3.92 95% CI 1.30-11.84, p = 0.015) and hypoperfusion mismatch volume >3.5 mL at a T max>6 s threshold (HR 6.55 95% CI 1.60-26.88, p < 0.001). The recurrence risk was similar to another real world ICAD cohort (20.2%), and higher than that seen in clinical trials (2.2%–5.7%), even in those treated with maximal medical treatment or meeting inclusion criteria for trials. In patients with symptomatic ICAS, the real-world recurrence of ischemic events is higher than that seen in clinical trials, even in subgroups receiving the same pharmacological treatment strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10523057
Volume :
32
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
163615749
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2023.107086