Back to Search Start Over

A review on the effects of discharging conventionally treated livestock waste to the environmental resistome.

Authors :
Kenneth, Mutebi John
Koner, Suprokash
Hsu, Gwo-Jong
Chen, Jung-Sheng
Hsu, Bing-Mu
Source :
Environmental Pollution; Dec2023, Vol. 338, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 1p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Globally, animal production has developed rapidly as a consequence of the ongoing population growth, to support food security. This has consequently led to an extensive use of antibiotics to promote growth and prevent diseases in animals. However, most antibiotics are not fully metabolized by these animals, leading to their excretion within urine and faeces, thus making these wastes a major reservoir of antibiotics residues, antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) in the environment. Farmers normally depend on conventional treatment methods to mitigate the environmental impact of animal waste; however, these methods are not fully efficient to remove the environmental resistome. The present study reviewed the variability of residual antibiotics, ARB, as well as ARGs in the conventionally treated waste and assessed how discharging it could increase resistome in the receiving environments. Wherein, considering the efficiency and environmental safety, an addition of pre-treatments steps with these conventional treatment methods could enhance the removal of antibiotic resistance agents from livestock waste. [Display omitted] • Livestock waste harbors residual antibiotics, resistant bacteria, and genes. • Conventional treatment can't fully remove antibiotic-resistant bacteria & genes. • Livestock waste releases antibiotics, resistant bacteria, and genes into the environment. • Antibiotics residue in livestock waste increased the niche environmental resistome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02697491
Volume :
338
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Environmental Pollution
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
173342998
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122643