Back to Search Start Over

NODDI May Be More Sensitive to Neurodegenerative Changes Than Structural MRI.

Authors :
Yu, Xi
Gebre, Robel K
Przybelski, Scott A.
Reid, Robert I.
Raghavan, Sheelakumari
Lesnick, Timothy G.
Lowe, Val J.
Machulda, Mary M.
Knopman, David S.
Petersen, Ronald C.
Kantarci, Kejal
Graff‐Radford, Jonathan
Jack, Clifford R.
Vemuri, Prashanthi
Source :
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association; Dec2023 Supplement 10, Vol. 19 Issue 10, p1-3, 3p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) measures from diffusion MRI provide information about tissue microstructure. Our goal was to compare the sensitivity of NODDI to structural MRI (sMRI) in capturing neurodegenerative changes in the gray matter due to aging and dementia. Method: We included 815 participants [644 cognitively unimpaired (CU), 103 MCI, 68 AD] from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) and Mayo ADRC with sMRI and multi‐shell diffusion MRI. We assessed gray matter volumes scaled by head size and cortical thicknesses from sMRI and neurite density index (NDI) and isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF) from NODDI. Pairwise Spearman correlations were calculated between imaging measures and Tau‐PET SUVRs in Braak I‐II, III‐IV, and V‐VI regions of interest (ROI) in participants = 60 years. Separate multivariable linear regression models were fit for the prediction of brain age using sMRI and NODDI in 515 CU participants. The predicted age gaps were calculated as chronological age minus predicted age in the remaining participants. We compared age gaps computed by sMRI and NODDI using disease surrogates (APOE4 genotype, AD pathologies via PET, WMH via FLAIR‐MRI, vascular risk, cognition via MMSE). Result: Braak ROIs, sMRI, and NODDI measures were correlated. The correlations between ISOVF and Tau‐PET SUVRs were stronger than correlations between NDI, volume, and thickness and Tau‐PET SUVR (Fig.1). MMSE was more associated with ISOVF than Tau‐PET and other imaging measures. The sMRI regression models had a higher mean absolute error (MAE) of 4.13 years than NODDI models with an MAE of 4.02 years. The NODDI model better predicted age gap separation between CU, MCI, and AD compared to the sMRI model (Fig.2). The NODDI predicted age gap showed stronger correlations with global amyloid‐PET SUVR, meta‐ROI Tau‐PET SUVR, CMC, APOE4, and MMSE (Fig. 3). Conclusion: NODDI, especially ISOVF, had stronger correlations with MMSE and Tau‐PET SUVRs across all Braak ROIs. The brain age prediction model trained using NODDI was more sensitive in detecting neurodegeneration changes than sMRI based on associations with disease surrogates. Our work suggests that NODDI in gray matter may be a more sensitive surrogate of neurodegeneration compared to sMRI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15525260
Volume :
19
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
174407593
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.081716