AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFTER SFFA V. HARVARD: THE OTHER DEFENSES.

The diversity justification for race affirmative action recognized in the Bakke-Grutter-Fisher line of cases survived the SFFA v. Harvard ruling. However, the diversity rationale is scathed enough that universities should end the nearly forty-year-old practice of relying exclusively on the institution’s educational need for diversity to satisfy strict scrutiny. This Article argues that the SFFA v. Harvard ruling is a wake-up call for universities to understand and be prepared to invoke other defenses for race affirmative action in college admissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]