Back to Search Start Over

Save Your Back: Comparison of the Compressive Force on the Lower Back Based on Differences in the Training Techniques.

Authors :
Callihan, Michael L.
McCoy, Thomas
Reed, Cindy
Morley, Christy
Law, Evette
Philipps, Tori
Source :
Journal of Emergency Nursing; Sep2024, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p651-659, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Musculoskeletal injury prevention for nurses is aimed at removing the need to manually position patients. In the ED, this is not always possible or practical. The purpose of this study is to compare the calculated estimated compressive force on the lumbar spine between recommended lifting techniques and the SHAPE lifting method during the horizontal transfer of a patient. Twenty-one student nurses completed the horizontal transfer of a simulated patient while motion was collected using inertial measurement units. Motion data were analyzed to calculate an estimated compressive force on the lumbar spine while completing the movement based on current recommended lifting methods and while using the SHAPE lifting method. A significant reduction in estimated peak and average compressive force at the lumbar spine was found during both the push and the pull portions (P <.001) of the horizontal transfer. While the optimal way to limit musculoskeletal injury among nurses is to eliminate the need for manual handling of a patient, this is not always possible in the ED. It is critical that when emergency nurses must reposition a patient, they perform the movement in the most biomechanically sound method while using a friction reduction. These findings, coupled with the previous biomechanical risk factor reduction related to the SHAPE lifting intervention, gives promise to a safer lifting strategy for emergency nurses moving forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00991767
Volume :
50
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Emergency Nursing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
179104913
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2023.12.009