Stereotactic-Guided Magnetic Seed Localisation Versus Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation: A Comparison of Total Resection Volumes.

MLA

Mak, R. Y. S., et al. “Stereotactic-Guided Magnetic Seed Localisation Versus Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation: A Comparison of Total Resection Volumes.” Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, vol. 27, no. 3, July 2024, pp. e164–70. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2317719.

APA

Mak, R. Y. S., Wong, A. H. C., Mo, C. K. M., Chin, K. H., Wong, W. W. C., Chau, P. L., Ling, Y. H., Ma, L. W. Y., Lee, J. S. Y., Chan, J. Y. W., Choi, C. Y., & Lai, A. Y. T. (2024). Stereotactic-Guided Magnetic Seed Localisation Versus Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation: A Comparison of Total Resection Volumes. Hong Kong Journal of Radiology, 27(3), e164–e170. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2317719

Chicago

Mak, R. Y. S., A. H. C. Wong, C. K. M. Mo, K. H. Chin, W. W. C. Wong, P. L. Chau, Y. H. Ling, et al. 2024. “Stereotactic-Guided Magnetic Seed Localisation Versus Radioguided Occult Lesion Localisation: A Comparison of Total Resection Volumes.” Hong Kong Journal of Radiology 27 (3): e164–70. doi:10.12809/hkjr2317719.