Back to Search Start Over

Feasibility of Delivering 5-Day Normobaric Hypoxia Breathing in a Hospital Setting.

Authors :
Berra, Lorenzo
Medeiros, Kyle J.
Marrazzo, Francesco
Patel, Sarvagna
Imber, David
Rezoagli, Emanuele
Yu, Binglan
Sonny, Abraham
Bittner, Edward A.
Fisher, Daniel
Chipman, Daniel
Sharma, Rohit
Shah, Hardik
Gray, Brianna E.
Harris, N. Stuart
Ichinose, Fumito
Mootha, Vamsi K.
Source :
Respiratory Care; Nov2024, Vol. 69 Issue 11, p1400-1408, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Beneficial effects of breathing at F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> < 0.21 on disease outcomes have been reported in previous preclinical and clinical studies. However, the safety and intra-hospital feasibility of breathing hypoxic gas for 5 d have not been established. In this study, we examined the physiologic effects of breathing a gas mixture with F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> as low as 0.11 in 5 healthy volunteers. METHODS: All 5 subjects completed the study, spending 5 consecutive days in a hypoxic tent, where the ambient oxygen level was lowered in a stepwise manner over 5 d, from F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.16 on the first day to F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.11 on the fifth day of the study. All the subjects returned to an environment at room air on the sixth day. The subjects' S<subscript>p</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>, heart rate, and breathing frequency were continuously recorded, along with daily blood sampling, neurologic evaluations, transthoracic echocardiography, and mental status assessments. RESULTS: Breathing hypoxia concentration dependently caused profound physiologic changes, including decreased SpO2 and increased heart rate. At F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.14, the mean SpO2 was 92%; at F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.13, the mean S<subscript>p</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> was 93%; at F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.12, the mean S<subscript>p</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> was 88%; at F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.11, the mean S<subscript>p</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> was 85%; and, finally, at an F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> of 0.21, the mean S<subscript>p</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> was 98%. These changes were accompanied by increased erythropoietin levels and reticulocyte counts in blood. All 5 subjects concluded the study with no adverse events. No subjects exhibited signs of mental status changes or pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the current physiologic study suggests that, within a hospital setting, delivering F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> as low as 0.11 is feasible and safe in healthy subjects, and provides the foundation for future studies in which therapeutic effects of hypoxia breathing are tested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00201324
Volume :
69
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Respiratory Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180579727
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11928