Back to Search Start Over

Hybrid FE-ML model for turning of 42CrMo4 steel.

Authors :
Laakso, Sampsa Vili Antero
Mityakov, Andrey
Niinimäki, Tom
Ribeiro, Kandice Suane Barros
Bessa, Wallace Moreira
Source :
CIRP: Journal of Manufacturing Science & Technology; Dec2024, Vol. 55, p333-346, 14p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Metal cutting processes contribute significant share of the added value of industrial products. The need for machining has grown exponentially with increasing demands for quality and accuracy, and despite of more than a century of research in the field, there are no reliable and accurate models that describe all the physical phenomena needed to optimize the machining processes. The scientific community has begun to explore hybrid methods instead of expanding the capabilities of individual modelling schemes, which has been more efficient than efficacious direction. Following this trend, we propose a hybrid finite element — machine learning method (FEML) for modelling metal cutting. The advantages of the FEML method are reduced need for experimental data, reduced computational time and improved prediction accuracy. This paper describes the FEML model, which uses a Coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL) formulation and deep neural networks (DNN) from the TensorFlow Python library. The machining experiments include forces, chip morphology and surface roughness. The experimental data was divided into training dataset and validation dataset to confirm the model predictions outside the experimental data range. The hybrid FEML model outperformed the DNN and FEM models independently, by reducing the computational time, improving the average prediction error from 23% to 13% and reduced the need for experimental data by half. [Display omitted] • A Novel Hybrid FEML model based on Deep Neural Networks (DDN) and Finite Element Method (FEM) is proposed for predicting metal cutting process outcomes. • Hybrid FEML model outperforms DNN and FEM models independently regarding prediction accuracy, computational time and need for experimental data. • FEM model with CEL formulation has advantages in 3D machining simulations over ALE methods because CEL does not require remeshing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17555817
Volume :
55
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
CIRP: Journal of Manufacturing Science & Technology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
181284393
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.003