Back to Search Start Over

Improving interpreting for dementia assessments: Results from the MINDSET trial.

Authors :
Brijnath, Bianca
Cavuoto, Marina G.
Markusevska, Simona
Gilbert, Andrew
Antoniades, Josefine
Garcia, Erika Gonzalez
Hlavac, Jim
Low, Lee‐Fay
LoGiudice, Dina
Woodward‐Kron, Robyn
Enticott, Joanne
Hwang, Kerry
White, Jennifer
Lin, Xiaoping
Source :
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association; Dec2024 Supplement 1, Vol. 20, p1-2, 2p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: The Improving Interpreting for Dementia Assessments (MINDSET) study aimed to upskill interpreters through an online co‐designed course in dementia and cognitive assessments. Methods: A single‐blinded randomized controlled digital trial conducted between June 2022 and November 2023. Interpreters were randomized to training or waitlist control conditions with 3‐ and 6‐month follow‐up. The primary outcome was a composite Z‐score comprising dementia and cross‐cultural knowledge, translation and ethical knowledge, and observed interpreting skills. Preliminary analyses were conducted using a mixed ANOVA with assessment period as the within‐subjects factor and intervention group as the between‐subjects factor, controlling for age. Results: 126 interpreters (Mage = 44.13 years (SD = 12.71) completed baseline (22 Arabic, 14 Cantonese, 6 Greek, 14 Italian, 64 Mandarin, 6 Vietnamese), 3m follow‐up (n = 100) and 6m follow‐up (n = 101). For the primary outcome, there were no significant main effects for assessment period F (2, 178) = 0.21, p =.814 nor intervention group F (1, 89) = 0.31, p =.548, and no significant interaction between intervention group and assessment period, F (2, 178) = 0.64, p =.526. Secondary outcomes revealed significant main effects for dementia knowledge (DKAS) for the assessment period, F (2, 98) = 8.80, p <.001, and intervention group F (1, 99) = 4.59, p =.035, with significantly higher scores at the 3‐ (mean difference = 1.308, SE =.31, p <.001, 95% CI.692, 1.924) and 6‐month follow‐up (mean difference =.814, SE =.31, p =.010, 95% CI.203, 1.425); and significantly higher scores in the intervention compared to control (mean difference =.842, SE =.393, p =.035, 95% CI.062, 1.621). A significant interaction between assessment period and intervention group F (2, 98) = 3.33, p =.040 indicated that the increase in scores at the 3‐ and 6‐month periods were greater for the intervention group. Conclusions: This is the first time a dementia training resource for interpreters has been trialled. Preliminary analyses revealed an improvement in interpreter's dementia knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15525260
Volume :
20
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
182050604
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.085823