Spoiled for Choice: If debates over style are silly, false, and passé, they can also make clear what is at stake.

The article discusses the lack of recent debates over style and form in landscape architecture, particularly focusing on the past conflict between New Urbanists and Landscape Urbanists. It reflects on the historical disputes in the field and the significance of style debates in shaping the profession. The text also highlights the current convergence towards a unified vision in landscape architecture, emphasizing the importance of creating healthy and equitable communities through design. [Extracted from the article]