Back to Search Start Over

Methadone-Buprenorphine Transfers Using Low Dosing of Buprenorphine: An Open-label, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Tremonti, Chris
Blogg, James
Jamshidi, Nazila
Harjanto, Ricky
Miles, Nicholas
Ismay, Charlotte
Page, Robert
Mills, Llew
Buckley, Nicholas
Perananthan, Varan
Lintzeris, Nicholas
Haber, Paul
Source :
Journal of Addiction Medicine; Jan/Feb2025, Vol. 19 Issue 1, p75-82, 8p
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

Aims: To compare a low-dosing protocol to standard practice for methadone-buprenorphine transfers. Methods: We undertook a nonrandomized open-label clinical trial across 8 sites from NSW, Australia. Participants prescribed methadone wishing to transfer to buprenorphine could either choose or be randomized to a low-dose transfer or standard care transfer as per NSW health guidelines. The low-dose protocol started at 0.2 mg BD and increased to 16 mg on day 6, with flexible dosing thereafter. The primary outcome was continuation of buprenorphine 1 week post-transfer. Binary logistic regression was used to access the primary outcome with demographic differences between the groups included as covariates. Results: There were 117 participants who commenced the study, 101 in the low-dose arm and 16 in standard care. Mean methadone dose was 82 mg in the low-dose arm and 46 mg in standard care. The primary outcome was met by 81 participants in the low-dose arm (80%) and 13 participants in standard care (81%). There was no significant between-arm difference in the odds of the primary outcome (OR = 2.22; 95% CI: 0.45–10.91; P = 0.327). Four participants (4%) in the low-dose arm experienced precipitated withdrawal against 1 (6%) in standard care. Higher methadone dose decreased the odds of successful transfer by 20% (OR = 0.8 per 10 mg methadone; 95% CI: 0.7–0.99; P = 0.04). Withdrawal scores between the 2 arms were similar. Conclusions: We were unable to detect a difference between low dosing and standard care for methadone to buprenorphine transfers. Increasing methadone dose was a predictor of success; setting (ambulatory or inpatient) was not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19320620
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
182641917
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001379