Back to Search Start Over

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Revascularization Alone Versus Revascularization and Mitral Valve Repair.

Authors :
Kim, Yong-Hwan
Czer, Lawrence S.C.
Soukiasian, Harmik J.
De Robertis, Michele
Magliato, Kathy E.
Blanche, Carlos
Raissi, Sharo S.
Mirocha, James
Siegel, Robert J.
Kass, Robert M.
Trento, Alfredo
Source :
Annals of Thoracic Surgery; Jun2005, Vol. 79 Issue 6, p1895-1901, 7p
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

Background: In this study we compared the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) by revascularization alone and by revascularization combined with mitral valve repair. Methods: We studied 355 patients who underwent revascularization alone (n = 168) or revascularization combined with mitral valve repair (n = 187) for IMR from March 1994 to September 2003. Preoperative and operative characteristics, postoperative mitral regurgitation severity, operative mortality, and late survival were examined for each surgical group. Results: No differences were noted between the two groups in age, sex, history of diabetes or hypertension, and number of bypass grafts. The combined surgical group had a lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (0.38 ± 0.14 versus 0.44 ± 0.15), greater severity of IMR, higher frequency of prior myocardial infarction, and longer cross-clamp and pump times (p < 0.01). The combined surgical group had a greater reduction in IMR grade (2.7 ± 0.1 grades versus 0.2 ± 0.1 grade), a lower postoperative IMR grade (0.9 ± 0.1 versus 2.3 ± 0.1), and a higher success with reduction of IMR by two or more grades (89% versus 11%) (p < 0.001). In patients with 3+ or 4+ IMR, both groups had similar operative mortality (11.0% in the combined group compared with 4.7% for revascularization alone, p = 0.11) and actuarial survival at 5 years (44% ± 5% versus 41% ± 7%, p = 0.53). Independently predictive of higher early mortality (≤30 days) by Cox analysis were longer pump time (p < 0.001) and older age (p < 0.02). Predictive of late mortality (>30 days) were older age (p < 0.001), fewer bypass grafts (p < 0.01), and lower ejection fraction (p < 0.01). After adjustment for these variables, there was a trend (p = 0.08) toward a higher late survival with the combined surgical procedure. Conclusions: In patients with IMR, combined mitral valve repair and revascularization resulted in less postoperative mitral regurgitation and similar 5-year survival when compared with revascularization alone. Attempts to reduce pump time by using off-pump techniques may reduce early mortality in these high-risk patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034975
Volume :
79
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
18481068
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.11.005