Does Distance Matter in the Age of the Internet: Are Cities Losing Their Comparative Advantage?

Our study is part of the broad debate about the role of distance and technology for interpersonal contact. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically and explicitly compares the role of distance in social networks pre- and post-Internet. We analyze the effect of distance on the frequency of email, phone, face-to-face and overall contact in personal networks. We also compare the findings with its pre-Internet counterpart whose data were collected in 1978 in the same East York, Toronto locality. We use multilevel models with spline specification to examine the nonlinear effects of distance on the frequency of contact. The results show that email contact is generally insensitive to distance, but tends to increase for transoceanic relationships greater than 3,000 miles apart. Face-to-face contact remains strongly related to short distances (within five miles), while distance has little impact on how often people phone each other at the regional level (within 100 miles). The study concludes that email has only somewhat altered the way people maintain their relationships. The frequencies of face-to-face and phone contact among socially-close friends and relatives has hardly changed between the 1970s and the 2000s. Moreover, the sensitivity of these relationships to distance has remained similar, despite the communication affordances of the Internet and of low-cost telephony. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]