Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Storage and Compressive Cycles on the Bond Strength After Collagen Removal.

Authors :
Gonçalves, Luciano de Souza
Consani, Simonides
Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho
Schneider, Luis Felipe J.
Saboia, Vincente de Paulo de Aragão
Source :
Operative Dentistry; Nov/Dec2009, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p681-687, 7p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

This study verified the influence of storage and compressive loads on the microtensile bond strength (µtbs) of an adhesive system when using the conventional technique or collagen removal treatment. Twenty bovine teeth were separated into four groups: G1) adhesive system Prime & Bond NT (PENT) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions, G2) PBNT after deproteinization with 10% sodium hypochlorite (NaOC1), G3) PBNT in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions + 50,000 compressive cycles and G4) PBNT after deproteinization + 50,000 compressive cycles. After 24 hours, the teeth were sectioned and half of the specimens were stored in water (37°C) for further evaluation (after 60 days). The failure mode was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bond strength values were separately submitted to two-way ANOVA for each period and the differences among groups were determined by Tukey's test (p=0.05). Comparisons between 24 hours and GO days were determined by multiple paired Student's f-tests (5%). The evaluation at 24 hours revealed that deproteinization did not affect µtbs for the non-cycled groups (G1 = 47.8 ± 4.7 and G2 = 52.4 ± 11.32). For the groups tested after the mechanical cycles, deproteinization produced higher µtbs (G3 = 32.7 ± 9.6 and G4 = 43.3 ± 16.7). At 60 days, deproteinization produced higher µtbs than the manufacturers' recommendations for the cycled and non-cycled groups (GI = 31.5 * 5.8; G2 = 48.8 ± 7.7; G3 = 17.1 ± 7.2 and G4 = 48.8 ± 12.2). In conclusion, the deproteinized groups were less susceptible to degradation than the groups restored with the conventional technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03617734
Volume :
34
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Operative Dentistry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
48154064
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2341/08-064-L