On Peter H. L. Chang's Debates on "No Argument" of "Non-resistance" Policy.

Owing to Mukden Incident, Peter H. L. Chang was to blame for his "Non-resistance" policy. In response, Peter H. L. Chang once claimed that he would neither argue nor contend about it, and whether he should be praised or condemned for it was open to debate. In his oral accounts, however, the problem Peter H. L. Chang expounded most was the "Non-resistance" policy in Mukden Incident. He not only introspected, but also defended for himself. He disputed about the details, which he believed were vital to reconstruct the distant past; he admitted his misjudgment, but denied his "Non-resistance" policy. The so-called "No Argument" debates actually have overturned many historical perspectives, eliminated important historical doubts and helped people see clearly Peter H. L. Chang's adventures of mind as a person involved in the incident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]