Back to Search Start Over

3-Year Clinical Outcomes in the Randomized SORT OUT III Superiority Trial Comparing Zotarolimus- and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents.

Authors :
Maeng, Michael
Tilsted, Hans-Henrik
Jensen, Lisette Okkels
Kaltoft, Anne
Kelbæk, Henning
Abildgaard, Ulrik
Villadsen, Anton B.
Krusell, Lars Romer
Ravkilde, Jan
Hansen, Knud Nørregaard
Christiansen, Evald Høj
Aarøe, Jens
Jensen, Jan Skov
Kristensen, Steen Dalby
Bøtker, Hans Erik
Madsen, Morten
Thayssen, Per
Sørensen, Henrik Toft
Thuesen, Leif
Lassen, Jens Flensted
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions; Aug2012, Vol. 5 Issue 8, p812-818, 7p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine the 3-year clinical outcomes in patients treated with the Endeavor (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) or the Cypher (Cordis, Johnson & Johnson, Warren, New Jersey) sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in routine clinical practice. Background: The long-term clinical outcome in patients treated with ZES in comparison with SES is unclear. Methods: The authors randomized 2,332 patients to ZES (n = 1,162) or SES (n = 1,170) implantation. Endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization; the individual endpoints of MACE; and definite stent thrombosis. Results: At 3-year follow-up, the MACE rate was higher in patients treated with ZES than in patients treated with SES (148 [12.9%] vs. 116 [10.1%]; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 1.69; p = 0.022). Target vessel revascularization was more frequent in the ZES group compared with the SES group (103 [9.1%] vs. 76 [6.7%]; HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.89; p = 0.025), whereas the occurrence of myocardial infarction (3.8% vs. 3.3%) and cardiac death (2.8% vs. 2.8%) did not differ significantly. Although the rate of definite stent thrombosis was similar at 3-year follow-up (1.1% vs. 1.4%), very late (12 to 36 months) definite stent thrombosis occurred in 0 (0%) patients in the ZES group versus 12 (1.1%) patients in the SES group (p = 0.0005). Conclusions: Although the 3-year MACE rate is higher in patients treated with ZES versus SES, our data highlight a late safety problem concerning definite stent thrombosis with the use of SES. This finding underscores the importance of long-term follow-up in head-to-head comparisons of drug-eluting stents. (Randomized Clinical Comparison of the Endeavor and the Cypher Coronary Stents in Non-selected Angina Pectoris Patients [SORT OUT III]; NCT00660478) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19368798
Volume :
5
Issue :
8
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
79339984
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.04.008