Evaluation of lesions of the internal ligaments of the wrist; conventional magnetic resonance imaging versus MR arthrography (MRA).

Objective The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of direct MR arthrography compared to conventional MR imaging in the diagnosis of different pathologic entities affecting the internal ligaments of the wrist mainly the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments. Subjects and methods This study included 51 patients complaining of chronic wrist pain. Conventional MRI and MR arthrography (MRA) were done in all cases. Results A comparison of the sensitivity of conventional MRI versus MRA was done by correlating the final diagnosis of each modality with the results of arthroscopy. Regarding complete SLL tears, MRI revealed a SEN, SPE and ACC of 61.54%, 96.77%, and 86.36%, while MRA showed a SEN, SPE and ACC of 92.31%, 100%, and 97.73% respectively, partial SLL tears, un-enhanced MRI revealed SEN, SPE and ACC of 10%, 94.12%, and 75%, while MRA showed 66.67%, 85.71%, and 81.82% respectively, complete LTL tears un-enhanced MRI revealed a SEN, SPE, and ACC of 25%, 100%, and 79.5% respectively, while MRA showed 91.67%, 100%, and 97.73% respectively. Conclusion MR arthrography is a potent additional tool facilitating the diagnosis of different pathologic entities affecting the major internal ligaments of the wrist joint and helps to reduce arthroscopic interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]