Back to Search Start Over

Configurational Equilibria in Amido and Lithioamido Complexes of Formulas (η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>5</INF>)Re(NO)(PAr<INF>3</INF>)(&Numl;HCHRR‘) and (η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>5</INF>)Re(NO)(PAr<INF>3</INF>)(&Numl;LiR‘‘):  Epimerization Occurs at Rhenium via Phosphine Dissociation

Authors :
Dewey, M. A.
Stark, G. A.
Gladysz, J. A.
Source :
Organometallics; October 29, 1996, Vol. 15 Issue: 22 p4798-4807, 10p
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

The diastereomerically and enantiomerically pure amido complex (SR)-(η&lt;SUP&gt;5&lt;/SUP&gt;-C&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;H&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;)Re(NO)(PPh&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)(&amp;Numl;HCH(CH&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)Ph) ((SR)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt;) converts to (RR)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; (inversion at rhenium, retention at carbon) in THF-d&lt;INF&gt;8&lt;/INF&gt; at 49.4 &#176;C with k&lt;INF&gt;1&lt;/INF&gt; = 2.34 &#215; 10&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;4&lt;/SUP&gt; s&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;1&lt;/SUP&gt; and k&lt;INF&gt;-&lt;/INF&gt;&lt;INF&gt;1&lt;/INF&gt; = 0.90 &#215; 10&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;4&lt;/SUP&gt; s&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;1&lt;/SUP&gt;. Similarly, (SS)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; converts to (RS)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; with k&lt;INF&gt;1&lt;/INF&gt; = 0.90 &#215; 10&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;4&lt;/SUP&gt; s&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;1&lt;/SUP&gt; and k&lt;INF&gt;-&lt;/INF&gt;&lt;INF&gt;1&lt;/INF&gt; = 2.30 &#215; 10&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;4&lt;/SUP&gt; s&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;1&lt;/SUP&gt;. Both epimerizations give equilibrium ratios (RR/SR or SS/RS) of 70:30. Reactions with HOTf yield [(η&lt;SUP&gt;5&lt;/SUP&gt;-C&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;H&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;)Re(NO)(PPh&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)(NH&lt;INF&gt;2&lt;/INF&gt;CH(CH&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)Ph)]&lt;SUP&gt;+&lt;/SUP&gt;TfO&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;, and subsequent additions of Et&lt;INF&gt;4&lt;/INF&gt;N&lt;SUP&gt;+&lt;/SUP&gt;CN&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt; afford (η&lt;SUP&gt;5&lt;/SUP&gt;-C&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;H&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;)Re(NO)(PPh&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)(CN) and NH&lt;INF&gt;2&lt;/INF&gt;CH(CH&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)Ph (all steps with retention at rhenium and carbon). Enantiomeric purities and absolute configurations are assayed by chiral NMR shift reagents and (−)-menthyl chloroformate derivatives, respectively, establishing configurations of epimerized &lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt;. Reaction of (SR)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; and P(p-tol)&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt; in THF-d&lt;INF&gt;8&lt;/INF&gt; at 49.4 &#176;C gives (η&lt;SUP&gt;5&lt;/SUP&gt;-C&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;H&lt;INF&gt;5&lt;/INF&gt;)Re(NO)(P(p-tol)&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)(&amp;Numl;HCH(CH&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt;)Ph) (50:50 (t&lt;INF&gt;0&lt;/INF&gt;) → 66:34 (t&lt;INF&gt;∞&lt;/INF&gt;) RR/SR) with k = 4.6 &#215; 10&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;4&lt;/SUP&gt; s&lt;SUP&gt;-&lt;/SUP&gt;&lt;SUP&gt;1&lt;/SUP&gt;, twice that for the conversion of (SR)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; to (RR)-&lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt;. Rate data for the latter at 32.3−59.1 &#176;C give ΔH&lt;SUP&gt;&amp;thermod;&lt;/SUP&gt; = 26 kcal/mol and ΔS&lt;SUP&gt;&amp;thermod;&lt;/SUP&gt; = 6 eu. These results are best modeled by mechanisms involving initial and rate determining PPh&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt; dissociation, with anchimeric assistance by the amido lone pair, to give an intermediate that is trigonal planar at rhenium and combines with PAr&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt; without significant diastereoselectivity. Reactions of n-BuLi with &lt;BO&gt;5&lt;/BO&gt; and related complexes give &amp;Numl;LiR species from which PPh&lt;INF&gt;3&lt;/INF&gt; is lost at lower temperatures, and are presumed to be much less configurationally stable.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02767333 and 15206041
Volume :
15
Issue :
22
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Organometallics
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs1151632