Inferior Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Paracentral Keratoconus With No Coincident Topographic and Coma Axis

PURPOSE:To assess the visual and refractive outcomes of implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconic eyes with no coincident topographic and comatic axes.METHODS:Forty-one keratoconic eyes of 39 patients with no coincident topographic and comatic axes were implanted inferiorly with a Ferrara-type ICRS (Keraring SI6; Mediphacos Inc., Belo Horizonte, Brazil) of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, and 250 Forty-one keratoconic eyes of 39 patients with no coincident topographic and comatic axes were implanted inferiorly with a Ferrara-type ICRS (Keraring SI6; Mediphacos Inc., Belo Horizonte, Brazil) of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, and 250 μm. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal coma-like root mean square, and residual refractive errors analyzed using vector analysis were recorded before and 6 months after the ICRS implantation.RESULTS:Mean UDVA was 0.76 ± 0.41 logMAR before and 0.53 ± 0.46 logMAR after surgery (Mean UDVA was 0.76 ± 0.41 logMAR before and 0.53 ± 0.46 logMAR after surgery (P= .0006). CDVA was 0.13 ± 0.14 logMAR before and 0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR after surgery (P= .0007). Two eyes (4.9%) lost two lines or more of CDVA, 3 eyes (7.32%) lost one line, 16 eyes (39.02%) had no change in CDVA, 9 eyes (21.95%) gained one line, and 11 eyes (26.83%) gained two lines or more of CDVA. The safety index was 1.10. Spherical equivalent was significantly reduced after ICRS implantation (P< .001). Corneal coma-like root mean square changed from 0.80 ± 0.53 μm before surgery to 0.61 ± 0.59 μm after surgery (P= .02) for 4.5 mm of pupil size.CONCLUSIONS:One Ferrara-type ICRS of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, or 250 One Ferrara-type ICRS of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, or 250 μm implanted inferiorly may reduce both astigmatism and corneal coma-like aberrations in keratoconic eyes with no coincident topographic and comatic axes, providing an improvement of UDVA and CDVA values.[[J Refract Surg.2013;29(4):266–272.]