Back to Search Start Over

Hydraulic Causes for Basin Hydrograph Skewness

Authors :
Collischonn, Walter
Fleischmann, Ayan
Paiva, Rodrigo C. D.
Mejia, Alfonso
Source :
Water Resources Research; December 2017, Vol. 53 Issue: 12 p10603-10618, 16p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

It has been suggested that hydrograph skewness depends on the relative dominance between hillslope and channel network transport processes, where the former ones make the hydrograph positively skewed while the latter tends to make it negatively skewed. More recently, however, the role of river hydraulics in shaping the hydrograph has been highlighted. We present a set of numerical modeling experiments using a hydrodynamic model of river networks in which we investigate how channel hydraulics influence the shape of the hydrograph, particularly its skewness. We further investigate the influence of base flow, rainfall intensity, cross section geometry, and basin scale on unit hydrograph response. We show that river hydraulics has a decisive role because positively skewed hydrographs may occur even when water inputs to the river network are negatively skewed, and in catchments whose width function is also negatively skewed. We show additional results related to the effect of the degree of nonlinearity in the relationship between celerity and discharge, the effects of base flow and rainfall intensity. These further confirm that hydraulic factors may be decisive in determining hydrograph shape. Celerity‐discharge relationship at a cross section is an important driver of basin hydrograph skewnessPositive skewed form of hydrographs may be less related to hillslope processes and geomorphology as previously supposed and more to river hydraulicsBase flow discharge conditions prior to a rainfall event affect the hydrograph skewness associated with that event

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00431397
Volume :
53
Issue :
12
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Water Resources Research
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs44520846
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021543