Back to Search Start Over

Exchanging and managing in-vitroelite germplasm to combat Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) and Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD) in Eastern and Southern Africa

Authors :
Tumwegamire, Silver
Kanju, Edward
Legg, James
Shirima, Rudolph
Kombo, Salehe
Mkamilo, Geoffrey
Mtunda, Kiddo
Sichalwe, Karoline
Kulembeka, Heneriko
Ndyetabura, Innocent
Saleh, Haji
Kawuki, Robert
Alicai, Titus
Adiga, Gerald
Benesi, Ibrahim
Mhone, Albert
Zacarias, Anabela
Matsimbe, Sofrimento
Munga, Theresia
Ateka, Elijah
Navangi, Lynet
Maruthi, Midatharahally
Mwatuni, Francis
Ngundo, George
Mwangangi, Maureen
Mbugua, Edward
Ndunguru, Joseph
Rajabu, Cyprian
Mark, Deogratius
Source :
Food Security; April 2018, Vol. 10 Issue: 2 p351-368, 18p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Cassava varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease (CMD) and cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) are needed for the food and income security of the rural poor in eastern and southern Africa (ESA). The International Institute of Tropical Agriculture led five national cassava breeding programs (Malawi, Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda) in virus-cleaning and exchanging elite cassava germplasm resistant to both diseases. This paper documents the experiences and lessons learned from the process. Thirty-one clones (25 elite, two standard and four national) were submitted by the five breeding programs to the Natural Resources Institute and Kenya Plant Health Inspectorate Services for virus cleaning and indexing. Subsequently, ca75 in-vitro virus-indexed plantlets per clone were sent to Genetic Technologies International Limited (GTIL), a private tissue culture (TC) lab in Kenya, and micro-propagated to produce ≥1500 plantlets. After fulfilling all the formal procedures of germplasm exchange between countries ≥300 plantlets per clone were sent to each partner country. National check clones susceptible to CMD/CBSD were sent only to their countries of origin. In each country, the in-vitro plantlets were acclimatized under screen house conditions and transferred to clean isolated sites for field multiplication. All the clones were cleaned of the viruses, except Tomo. The cleaning process was slow for F19-NL, NASE1, and Kibandameno and TC micro-propagation at GTIL was less efficient for Pwani, Tajirika, NASE1, and Okhumelela than for the other clones. Difficulties in cleaning recalcitrant clones affected the timeline for establishing the multi-site evaluation trials in target countries. The initiative is the one of the kind to successfully clean and exchange elite germplasm as a joint action to combat CBSD in ESA. Adequate preparation in terms of infrastructure and personnel are critical to successfully receiving and adapting the indexed in-vitro plants as new germplasm.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18764525 and 18764517
Volume :
10
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Food Security
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs45061314
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0779-2