Back to Search Start Over

Policies for reirradiation of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a survey among Italian radiation oncologists

Authors :
Furlan, Carlo
Arcangeli, Stefano
Avanzo, Michele
Mirri, Maria A.
Munoz, Fernando
Giudici, Stefania
Perrone, Antonio
Amelio, Dante
Tomio, Luigi
Draghini, Loredana
Deli, Aniko M.
Pavanato, Giovanni
Giuliano, Francesca M.
Pontoriero, Antonio
Ciammella, Patrizia
Navarria, Pierina
Iannalfi, Alberto
Buglione, Michela
Guida, Cesare
Cammelli, Silvia
Iorio, Vincenzo
Cardinali, Massimo
Genovesi, Domenico
Barsacchi, Lucia
Balducci, Mario
Bagnoli, Rita
Berti, Franco
Montesi, Giampaolo
Pasqualetti, Francesco
Bonome, Paolo
Santoni, Riccardo
Doino, Daniela
Schirru, Patrizia
Pinzi, Valentina
Borzillo, Valentina
Ferrarese, Fabio
Ferro, Marica
Cicco, Luigi De
Krengli, Marco
Scoccianti, Silvia
Donato, Vittorio
Source :
Tumori Journal; December 2018, Vol. 104 Issue: 6 p466-470, 5p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the contribution of Italian radiation oncologists in the current management of recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGG), focusing on a reirradiation (reRT) approach.Methods: In 2015, the Reirradiation and the Central Nervous System Study Groups on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) proposed a survey. All Italian radiation oncologists were individually invited to complete an online questionnaire regarding their clinical management of recurrent HGG, focusing on a reRT approach.Results: A total of 37 of 210 questionnaires were returned (18% of all centers): 16 (43%) from nonacademic hospitals, 14 (38%) from academic hospitals, 5 (13%) from private institutions, and 2 (6%) from hadron therapy centers. The majority of responding centers (59%) treated ≤5 cases per year. Performance status at the time of recurrence, along with a target diameter <5 cm and an interval from primary radiation ≥6 months, were the prevalent predictive factors considered for reRT. Sixty percent of reirradiated patients had already received a salvage therapy, either chemotherapy (40%) or reoperation (20%). The most common approach for reRT was fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to a mean (photon) dose of 41.6 Gy.Conclusions: Although there were wide variations in the clinical practice of reRT across the 37 centers, the core activities were reasonably consistent. These findings provide a basis for encouraging a national collaborative study to develop, implement, and monitor the use of reRT in this challenging clinical setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03008916 and 20382529
Volume :
104
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Tumori Journal
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs47839908
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000615