Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Bovine Oocyte Maturation Media on Oocyte Transcript Levels, Blastocyst Development, Cell Number, and Apoptosis1

Authors :
Watson, Andrew J.
De Sousa, Paul
Caveney, Anita
Barcroft, Lisa C.
Natale, David
Urquhart, Jennifer
Westhusin, Mark E.
Source :
Biology of Reproduction; February 2000, Vol. 62 Issue: 2 p355-364, 10p
Publication Year :
2000

Abstract

The objectives were 1) to investigate the effects of oocyte maturation in serum-free and amino acid-supplemented defined media on oocyte transcript levels, blastocyst cell number, and apoptosis; 2) to investigate the influence of oocyte maturation culture atmosphere on blastocyst development, total cell number, and apoptosis; and 3) to examine the influence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) during oocyte maturation on blastocyst cell number and apoptosis. The results demonstrate that blastocysts derived from in vitro maturation, fertilization, and embryo culture protocols undergo apoptosis but that apoptotic levels are not greatly influenced by the oocyte maturation environment. Amino acid supplementation of oocyte maturation media was associated with enhanced developmental frequencies, increased blastocyst cell number, and elevated oocyte maternal mRNA levels. Oocyte maturation with supplemented synthetic oviduct fluid medium (cSOFMaa) resulted in blastocyst cell numbers comparable to those observed with Tissue Culture Medium 199 + newborn calf serum. Blastocyst development was reduced following oocyte maturation under a 5% CO2, 7% O2, 88% N2culture atmosphere. EGF supplementation of oocyte maturation medium resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in blastocyst development but did not influence blastocyst total cell number or apoptosis. Our findings indicate that cSOFMaa medium is an effective base medium for bovine oocyte maturation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00063363 and 15297268
Volume :
62
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Biology of Reproduction
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs50058975
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.2.355