Back to Search Start Over

Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial

Authors :
Columbo, Jesse A.
Kang, Ravinder
Spangler, Emily L.
Newhall, Karina
Brooke, Benjamin S.
Dosluoglu, Hasan
Lee, Eugene S.
Raffetto, Joseph D.
Henke, Peter K.
Tang, Gale S.
Mureebe, Leila
Kougias, Panagoitis
Johanning, Jason
Arya, Shipra
Scali, Salvatore T.
Stone, David H.
Suckow, Bjoern D.
Orion, Kristine
Halpern, Vivienne
O'Connell, Jessica
Inhat, Daniel
Nelson, Peter
Tzeng, Edith
Zhou, Wei
Barry, Michael
Sirovich, Brenda
Goodney, Philip P.
Gaudette, Cory
Grippa, Francisco
Voorhees, Amy
Moore, Kayla
Dowse, Catherine
Barbey, Sarah
Galla, Ann
Grove, Lori
Belanger, Karen
Karamoto, Angela
Patel, Veep
Bigda, Susan
Jabori, Sinan
Chun, Kevin
Beckstrom, Julie
Maloney, Maria
Schieber, Molly
Zoble, Adam
Anderson, Stephanie
Morrison, Michael
Source :
Annals of Vascular Surgery; May 2020, Vol. 65 Issue: 1 p247-253, 7p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

For patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), randomized trials have found endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open surgical repair (OSR). However, OSR has fewer long-term aneurysm-related complications, such as endoleak or late rupture. Patients treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival rates within two years after surgery, and OSR does not require intensive surveillance. Few have examined if patient preferences are aligned with the type of treatment they receive for their AAA. Although many assume that patients may universally prefer the less-invasive nature of EVAR, our preliminary work suggests that patients who value the lower risk of late complications may prefer OSR.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08905096
Volume :
65
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Annals of Vascular Surgery
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs50232574
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.034