Back to Search Start Over

Results of Sacral Neuromodulation Therapy for Urinary Voiding Dysfunction: Five‐Year Experience of a Retrospective, Multicenter Study in China

Authors :
Zhang, Peng
Wang, Jian‐Ye
Zhang, Yaoguang
Liao, Limin
Lv, Jian‐wei
Ling, Qing
Wei, Zhong‐qing
Zhong, Tie
Xu, Zhi‐hui
Wen, Wei
Li, Jia‐yi
Luo, De‐Yi
Source :
Neuromodulation; August 2019, Vol. 22 Issue: 6 p730-737, 8p
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

This five‐year, retrospective, multicenter study evaluated the long‐term safety and efficiency of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) in Chinese patients with urinary voiding dysfunction. This is a Chinese national, multicenter, retrospective study that included 247 patients (51.2% female) who received an implantable pulse generator (IPG) (InterStim, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) between 2012 and 2016. Success was considered if the initial ≥50% improvement in any of primary voiding diary variables persisted compared with baseline. The results were further stratified by identifying patients who showed >50% improvement and those although showed <50% improvement but still wanted to receive IPG; these data were collected and analyzed for general improvement. Following test stimulation, 187 patients (43%) declined implantation and 247 (57%) underwent implantation using InterStim®. Among 247 patients, 34 (13.7%) had overactive bladder (OAB), 59 (23.8%) had interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), 47 (19%) had idiopathic urinary retention (IUR), and 107 (44.1%) had neurogenic bladder (NB). IPG efficiency rate for OAB, interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, idiopathic urinary retention, and neurogenic bladder were 42.5, 72.4, 51.6, and 58.8%, respectively. The mean duration of follow‐up was 20.1 ± 12.8 months. SNM appears effective in the long term, with a total IPG implantation rate of approximately 57% (ranging between 42.5 and 72.4% depending on indication). Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome appear to be the best indication for stage I testing. Chinese neurogenic bladder patients are most inclined to choose SNM. SNM is relatively safe, with low postoperation adverse events of 16.1% and reoperation rate of 3.2% during the follow‐up period.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10947159 and 15251403
Volume :
22
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Neuromodulation
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs50806902
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ner.12902