Back to Search Start Over

Understanding the role of hyperdiploidy in myeloma prognosis: which trisomies really matter?

Authors :
Chretien, Marie-Lorraine
Corre, Jill
Lauwers-Cances, Valerie
Magrangeas, Florence
Cleynen, Alice
Yon, Edwige
Hulin, Cyrille
Leleu, Xavier
Orsini-Piocelle, Frederique
Blade, Jean-Sebastien
Sohn, Claudine
Karlin, Lionel
Delbrel, Xavier
Hebraud, Benjamin
Roussel, Murielle
Marit, Gerald
Garderet, Laurent
Mohty, Mohamad
Rodon, Philippe
Voillat, Laurent
Royer, Bruno
Jaccard, Arnaud
Belhadj, Karim
Fontan, Jean
Caillot, Denis
Stoppa, Anne-Marie
Attal, Michel
Facon, Thierry
Moreau, Philippe
Minvielle, Stephane
Avet-Loiseau, Hervé
Source :
Blood; December 2015, Vol. 126 Issue: 25 p2713-2719, 7p
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

The prognosis of multiple myeloma is mainly dependent upon chromosomal changes. The 2 major abnormalities driving poor outcome are del(17p) and t(4;14). However, the outcome of these high-risk patients is not absolutely uniform, with some patients presenting long survival. We hypothesized that these better outcomes might be related to concomitant “good-risk” chromosomal changes exploring hyperdiploidy. We analyzed a large series of 965 myeloma patients, including 168 patients with t(4;14) and 126 patients with del(17p), using high-throughput single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays after plasma cell sorting. As expected, trisomic chromosomes were highly associated. Using the LASSO model, we found that only chromosome 3, when trisomic, was associated with a longer progression-free survival and that 3 trisomies modulated overall survival (OS) in myeloma patients: trisomies 3 and 5 significantly improved OS, whereas trisomy 21 worsened OS. In patients with t(4;14), trisomies 3 and/or 5 seemed to overcome the poor prognosis. For the first time, using a specific modeling approach, we show that not all trisomies display the same prognostic impact. This finding could be important for routine assessment of prognosis in myeloma, and some high-risk patients with a traditional evaluation could in fact be standard-risk patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00064971 and 15280020
Volume :
126
Issue :
25
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs57088036
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-06-650242