Back to Search Start Over

Trisomy 12 and elevated GLI1and PTCH1transcript levels are biomarkers for Hedgehog-inhibitor responsiveness in CLL

Authors :
Decker, Sarah
Zirlik, Katja
Djebatchie, Lauritte
Hartmann, David
Ihorst, Gabriele
Schmitt-Graeff, Annette
Herchenbach, Dieter
Jumaa, Hassan
Warmuth, Markus
Veelken, Hendrik
Dierks, Christine
Source :
Blood; January 2012, Vol. 119 Issue: 4 p997-1007, 11p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Hedgehog (HH) signaling is activated in various lymphoid malignancies, but conflicting results exist about its role in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Here, we demonstrate that the expression of essential HH pathway components like GLI1, PTCH1, and the HH ligands is highly diverse in CLL. A subset of 36.7% of 60 tested CLL samples responded to all 3 SMOOTHENED (SMO) inhibitors, whereas 40% were completely resistant. Responsiveness correlated with elevated GLI1and PTCH1transcript levels and the presence of trisomy 12, whereas no other karyotype correlated with responsiveness. All trisomy 12 CLLs displayed constitutive HH pathway activation driven by autocrine DESERT HH (DHH) ligand secretion, which could be blocked by the HH-blocking Ab 5E1. Cocultures with DHH-expressing BM stromal cells reduced sensitivity of CLLs to SMO-inhibitor treatment by activation of noncanonical ERK phosphorylation directly downstream of the PTCH1 receptor without involvement of SMO and could be overcome by the HH-blocking Ab 5E1 or a combination of SMO and ERK inhibitors. Our results demonstrate that the HH-signaling pathway is an interesting therapeutic target for a subset of patients with CLL, characterized by high GLI1and PTCH1transcript levels, and all patients with trisomy 12 and indicate HH-blocking Abs to be favorable over SMO inhibitors in overcoming stroma-mediated protective effects.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00064971 and 15280020
Volume :
119
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Blood
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs57088529
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-359075