Back to Search Start Over

Association of Delayed Surgery With Oncologic Long-term Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Not Responding to Preoperative Chemoradiation

Authors :
Deidda, Simona
Elmore, Ugo
Rosati, Riccardo
De Nardi, Paola
Vignali, Andrea
Puccetti, Francesco
Spolverato, Gaya
Capelli, Giulia
Zuin, Matteo
Muratore, Andrea
Danna, Riccardo
Calabrò, Marcello
Guerrieri, Mario
Ortenzi, Monica
Ghiselli, Roberto
Scabini, Stefano
Aprile, Alessandra
Pertile, Davide
Sammarco, Giuseppe
Gallo, Gaetano
Sena, Giuseppe
Coco, Claudio
Rizzo, Gianluca
Pafundi, Donato Paolo
Belluco, Claudio
Innocente, Roberto
Degiuli, Maurizio
Reddavid, Rossella
Puca, Lucia
Delrio, Paolo
Rega, Daniela
Conti, Pietro
Pastorino, Alessandro
Zorcolo, Luigi
Pucciarelli, Salvatore
Aschele, Carlo
Restivo, Angelo
Source :
JAMA Surgery; December 2021, Vol. 156 Issue: 12 p1141-1149, 9p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Extending the interval between the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery may enhance tumor response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, data on the association of delaying surgery with long-term outcome in patients who had a minor or poor response are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess a large series of patients who had minor or no tumor response to CRT and the association of shorter or longer waiting times between CRT and surgery with short- and long-term outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data from 1701 consecutive patients with rectal cancer treated in 12 Italian referral centers were analyzed for colorectal surgery between January 2000 and December 2014. Patients with a minor or null tumor response (ypT stage of 2 to 3 or ypN positive) stage greater than 0 to neoadjuvant CRT were selected for the study. The data were analyzed between March and July 2020. EXPOSURES: Patients who had a minor or null tumor response were divided into 2 groups according to the wait time between neoadjuvant therapy end and surgery. Differences in surgical and oncological outcomes between these 2 groups were explored. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were overall and disease-free survival between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of a total of 1064 patients, 654 (61.5%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. A total of 579 patients (54.4%) had a shorter wait time (8 weeks or less) 485 patients (45.6%) had a longer wait time (greater than 8 weeks). A longer waiting time before surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (67.6% [95% CI, 63.1%-71.7%] vs 80.3% [95% CI, 76.5%-83.6%] at 5 years; 40.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-46.5%] vs 57.8% [95% CI, 52.1%-63.0%] at 10 years; P < .001). Also, delayed surgery was associated with worse 5- and 10-year disease-free survival (59.6% [95% CI, 54.9%-63.9%] vs 72.0% [95% CI, 67.9%-75.7%] at 5 years; 36.2% [95% CI, 29.9%-42.4%] vs 53.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-59.1%] at 10 years; P < .001). At multivariate analysis, a longer waiting time was associated with an augmented risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.50-2.26; P < .001) and death/recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.39-2.04; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, a longer interval before surgery after completing neoadjuvant CRT was associated with worse overall and disease-free survival in tumors with a poor pathological response to preoperative CRT. Based on these findings, patients who do not respond well to CRT should be identified early after the end of CRT and undergo surgery without delay.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21686254 and 21686262
Volume :
156
Issue :
12
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
JAMA Surgery
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs58443348
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4566