Cite
Are micro enemas administered with a squeeze tube and a 5 cm-long nozzle as good or better than micro enemas administered with a 10 cm-long catheter attached to a syringe in people with a recent spinal cord injury? A non-inferiority, crossover randomised controlled trial
MLA
Kelly, Louise C., et al. “Are Micro Enemas Administered with a Squeeze Tube and a 5 Cm-Long Nozzle as Good or Better than Micro Enemas Administered with a 10 Cm-Long Catheter Attached to a Syringe in People with a Recent Spinal Cord Injury? A Non-Inferiority, Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial.” Spinal Cord, vol. 60, no. 12, Dec. 2022, pp. 1136–43. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00835-5.
APA
Kelly, L. C., Glinsky, J. V., Nier, L. M., Garrett, G., & Harvey, L. A. (2022). Are micro enemas administered with a squeeze tube and a 5 cm-long nozzle as good or better than micro enemas administered with a 10 cm-long catheter attached to a syringe in people with a recent spinal cord injury? A non-inferiority, crossover randomised controlled trial. Spinal Cord, 60(12), 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00835-5
Chicago
Kelly, Louise C., Joanne V. Glinsky, Lianne M. Nier, Gillian Garrett, and Lisa A. Harvey. 2022. “Are Micro Enemas Administered with a Squeeze Tube and a 5 Cm-Long Nozzle as Good or Better than Micro Enemas Administered with a 10 Cm-Long Catheter Attached to a Syringe in People with a Recent Spinal Cord Injury? A Non-Inferiority, Crossover Randomised Controlled Trial.” Spinal Cord 60 (12): 1136–43. doi:10.1038/s41393-022-00835-5.