Effect of autohydrolysis on hemicellulose extraction and pyrolytic hydrogen production from Eucalyptus urograndis

Ensuring environmental and social-economic sustainability in the use of materials from lignocellulosic biomass requires their fractionation and valorization of their main components. In this work, we used Eucalyptus urograndiswood to obtain chemicals and energy. The raw material was characterized in chemical terms and then subjected to autohydrolysis under variable operating conditions to optimize the extraction of hemicellulose derivatives relative to cellulose. The kinetics of the pyrolysis process was modeled in terms of activation energy and hydrogen production. Using temperatures in the range of 180–190 °C and treatment times in the range of 15–30 min allowed more than 74.5% of all hemicellulosic components in the raw material to be selectively extracted into the liquid post-hydrolysis phase, more than 90% of all glucan to remain in the solid phase and up to 27.8% of lignin to be removed. The thermal behavior of solid fraction was examined by thermogravimetric analysis, using variable heating rates under a nitrogen atmosphere, and the activation energy can be estimated by using the Flynn-Wall-Ozawa method. Based on the results, the pyrolysis of E. urograndiscan be modeled as a first-order reaction. The activation energy (Ea) at a fractional conversion αbetween 0.3 and 0.7 was 183 to 199 KJ mol−1for the raw material, whereas that for the solid residue from autohydrolysis ranged from 179 to 186 kJ mol−1at same fractional conversion when operational temperature in autohydrolysis was upper 185 °C. Based on the results, using temperatures above 180 °C and times of 15 min or longer [i.e., operating at the (0,0) experimental point for the autohydrolysis process] in combination with degrees of conversion from 0.3 to 0.8 reduced the activation energy of the pyrolysis process in relation to the raw material by up to 12% and removed hemicellulose by more 74.5% from it. In parallel, the comparative analysis of the Eavalues and the composition of the pyrolysis gas obtained showed a negative relationship between Eaand the amount of hydrogen produced.