Back to Search Start Over

Reference standards for gene fusion molecular assays on cytological samples: an international validation study

Authors :
Malapelle, Umberto
Pepe, Francesco
Pisapia, Pasquale
Altimari, Annalisa
Bellevicine, Claudio
Brunnstro¨m, Hans
Bruno, Rossella
Bu¨ttner, Reinhard
Cirnes, Luis
De Andrea, Carlos E
de Biase, Dario
Dumur, Catherine I
Ericson Lindquist, Kajsa
Fontanini, Gabriella
Gautiero, Eugenio
Gentien, David
Hofman, Paul
Hofman, Veronique
Iaccarino, Antonino
Lozano, Maria Dolores
Mayo-de-Las-Casas, Clara
Merkelbach-Bruse, Sabine
Pagni, Fabio
Roman, Ruth
Schmitt, Fernando C
Siemanowski, Janna
Roy-Chowdhuri, Sinchita
Tallini, Giovanni
Tresserra, Francesc
Vander Borght, Sara
Vielh, Philippe
Vigliar, Elena
Vita, Giulia Anna Carmen
Weynand, Birgit
Rosell, Rafael
Molina Vila, Miguel Angel
Troncone, Giancarlo
Source :
Journal of Clinical Pathology; 2023, Vol. 76 Issue: 1 p47-52, 6p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

AimsGene fusions assays are key for personalised treatments of advanced human cancers. Their implementation on cytological material requires a preliminary validation that may make use of cell line slides mimicking cytological samples. In this international multi-institutional study, gene fusion reference standards were developed and validated.MethodsCell lines harbouring EML4(13)–ALK(20) and SLC34A2(4)–ROS1(32) gene fusions were adopted to prepare reference standards. Eight laboratories (five adopting amplicon-based and three hybridisation-based platforms) received, at different dilution points two sets of slides (slide A 50.0%, slide B 25.0%, slide C 12.5% and slide D wild type) stained by Papanicolaou (Pap) and May Grunwald Giemsa (MGG). Analysis was carried out on a total of 64 slides.ResultsFour (50.0%) out of eight laboratories reported results on all slides and dilution points. While 12 (37.5%) out of 32 MGG slides were inadequate, 27 (84.4%) out of 32 Pap slides produced libraries adequate for variant calling. The laboratories using hybridisation-based platforms showed the highest rate of inadequate results (13/24 slides, 54.2%). Conversely, only 10.0% (4/40 slides) of inadequate results were reported by laboratories adopting amplicon-based platforms.ConclusionsReference standards in cytological format yield better results when Pap staining and processed by amplicon-based assays. Further investigation is required to optimise these standards for MGG stained cells and for hybridisation-based approaches.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00219746 and 14724146
Volume :
76
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Pathology
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs61519415
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207825