Cite
Image-derived instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation with 3D planning for glenoid component placement in reverse total shoulder replacements: a randomized controlled trial
MLA
Boekel, Pamela, et al. “Image-Derived Instrumentation vs. Conventional Instrumentation with 3D Planning for Glenoid Component Placement in Reverse Total Shoulder Replacements: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JSES International, vol. 7, no. 4, July 2023, pp. 614–22. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.004.
APA
Boekel, P., Rikard-Bell, M., Grant, A., Brandon, B., Doma, K., O, C. W. B., Wilkinson, M., & Morse, L. (2023). Image-derived instrumentation vs. conventional instrumentation with 3D planning for glenoid component placement in reverse total shoulder replacements: a randomized controlled trial. JSES International, 7(4), 614–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.004
Chicago
Boekel, Pamela, Matthew Rikard-Bell, Andrea Grant, Benjamin Brandon, Kenji Doma, Callaghan, William B. O, Matthew Wilkinson, and Levi Morse. 2023. “Image-Derived Instrumentation vs. Conventional Instrumentation with 3D Planning for Glenoid Component Placement in Reverse Total Shoulder Replacements: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JSES International 7 (4): 614–22. doi:10.1016/j.jseint.2023.03.004.