Back to Search Start Over

A Multicenter Study Validates the WHO 2022 Classification for Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Lesions With Clinical and Prognostic Relevance

Authors :
Mudhar, Hardeep Singh
Krishna, Yamini
Cross, Simon
Auw-Haedrich, Claudia
Barnhill, Raymond
Cherepanoff, Svetlana
Eagle, Ralph
Farmer, James
Folberg, Robert
Grossniklaus, Hans
Herwig-Carl, Martina C.
Hyrcza, Martin
Lassalle, Sandra
Loeffler, Karin U.
Moulin, Alexandre
Milman, Tatyana
Verdijk, Robert M.
Heegaard, Steffen
Coupland, Sarah E.
Source :
Laboratory Investigation; January 2024, Vol. 104 Issue: 1
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Several nomenclature and grading systems have been proposed for conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions (C-MIL). The fourth “WHO Classification of Eye Tumors” (WHO-EYE04) proposed a C-MIL classification, capturing the progression of noninvasive neoplastic melanocytes from low- to high-grade lesions, onto melanoma in situ (MIS), and then to invasive melanoma. This proposal was revised to the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system, which simplified the high-grade C-MIL, whereby MIS was subsumed into high-grade C-MIL. Our aim was to validate the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system using digitized images of C-MIL, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry. However, C-MIL cases were retrieved from 3 supraregional ocular pathology centers. Adequate conjunctival biopsies were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Melan-A, SOX10, and PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma. Digitized slides were uploaded on the SmartZoom platform and independently scored by 4 ocular pathologists to obtain a consensus score, before circulating to 14 expert eye pathologists for independent scoring. In total, 105 cases from 97 patients were evaluated. The initial consensus diagnoses using the WHO-EYE04 C-MIL system were as follows: 28 benign conjunctival melanoses, 13 low-grade C-MIL, 37 high-grade C-MIL, and 27 conjunctival MIS. Using this system resulted in 93% of the pathologists showing only fair-to-moderate agreement (kappa statistic) with the consensus score. The WHO-EYE05 C-MIL system (with high-grade C-MIL and MIS combined) improved consistency between pathologists, with the greatest level of agreement being seen with benign melanosis (74.5%) and high-grade C-MIL (85.4%). Lowest agreements remained between pathologists for low-grade C-MIL (38.7%). Regarding WHO-EYE05 C-MIL scoring and clinical outcomes, local recurrences of noninvasive lesions developed in 8% and 34% of the low- and high-grade cases. Invasive melanoma only occurred in 47% of the cases that were assessed as high-grade C-MIL. This extensive international collaborative study is the first to undertake a comprehensive review of the WHO-EYE05 C-MIL scoring system, which showed good interobserver agreement and reproducibility.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00236837 and 15300307
Volume :
104
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Laboratory Investigation
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs64411815
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100281