Back to Search Start Over

Risk of death by suicide following self-harm presentations to healthcare: development and validation of a multivariable clinical prediction rule (OxSATS)

Authors :
Fazel, Seena
Vazquez-Montes, Maria D L A
Molero, Yasmina
Runeson, Bo
D’Onofrio, Brian M
Larsson, Henrik
Lichtenstein, Paul
Walker, Jane
Sharpe, Michael
Fanshawe, Thomas R
Source :
Evidence-Based Mental Health; 2023, Vol. 26 Issue: 1 pe300673-e300673, 1p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

BackgroundAssessment of suicide risk in individuals who have self-harmed is common in emergency departments, but is often based on tools developed for other purposes.ObjectiveWe developed and validated a predictive model for suicide following self-harm.MethodsWe used data from Swedish population-based registers. A cohort of 53 172 individuals aged 10+ years, with healthcare episodes of self-harm, was split into development (37 523 individuals, of whom 391 died from suicide within 12 months) and validation (15 649 individuals, 178 suicides within 12 months) samples. We fitted a multivariable accelerated failure time model for the association between risk factors and time to suicide. The final model contains 11 factors: age, sex, and variables related to substance misuse, mental health and treatment, and history of self-harm. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis guidelines were followed for the design and reporting of this work.FindingsAn 11-item risk model to predict suicide was developed using sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, and showed good discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.78) and calibration in external validation. For risk of suicide within 12 months, using a 1% cut-off, sensitivity was 82% (75% to 87%) and specificity was 54% (53% to 55%). A web-based risk calculator is available (Oxford Suicide Assessment Tool for Self-harm or OxSATS).ConclusionsOxSATS accurately predicts 12-month risk of suicide. Further validations and linkage to effective interventions are required to examine clinical utility.Clinical implicationsUsing a clinical prediction score may assist clinical decision-making and resource allocation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13620347 and 1468960X
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs65053854
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2023-300673