Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of online recorded recovery narratives in improving quality of life for people with non‐psychotic mental health problems: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Slade, Mike
Rennick‐Egglestone, Stefan
Elliott, Rachel A.
Newby, Chris
Robinson, Clare
Gavan, Sean P.
Paterson, Luke
Ali, Yasmin
Yeo, Caroline
Glover, Tony
Pollock, Kristian
Callard, Felicity
Priebe, Stefan
Thornicroft, Graham
Repper, Julie
Keppens, Jeroen
Smuk, Melanie
Franklin, Donna
Walcott, Rianna
Harrison, Julian
Smith, Roger
Robotham, Dan
Bradstreet, Simon
Gillard, Steve
Cuijpers, Pim
Farkas, Marianne
Zeev, Dror Ben
Davidson, Larry
Kotera, Yasuhiro
Roe, James
Ng, Fiona
Llewellyn‐Beardsley, Joy
Source :
World Psychiatry; February 2024, Vol. 23 Issue: 1 p101-112, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Narratives describing first‐hand experiences of recovery from mental health problems are widely available. Emerging evidence suggests that engaging with mental health recovery narratives can benefit people experiencing mental health problems, but no randomized controlled trial has been conducted as yet. We developed the Narrative Experiences Online (NEON) Intervention, a web application providing self‐guided and recommender systems access to a collection of recorded mental health recovery narratives (n=659). We investigated whether NEON Intervention access benefited adults experiencing non‐psychotic mental health problems by conducting a pragmatic parallel‐group randomized trial, with usual care as control condition. The primary endpoint was quality of life at week 52 assessed by the Manchester Short Assessment (MANSA). Secondary outcomes were psychological distress, hope, self‐efficacy, and meaning in life at week 52. Between March 9, 2020 and March 26, 2021, we recruited 1,023 participants from across England (the target based on power analysis was 994), of whom 827 (80.8%) identified as White British, 811 (79.3%) were female, 586 (57.3%) were employed, and 272 (26.6%) were unemployed. Their mean age was 38.4±13.6 years. Mood and/or anxiety disorders (N=626, 61.2%) and stress‐related disorders (N=152, 14.9%) were the most common mental health problems. At week 52, our intention‐to‐treat analysis found a significant baseline‐adjusted difference of 0.13 (95% CI: 0.01‐0.26, p=0.041) in the MANSA score between the intervention and control groups, corresponding to a mean change of 1.56 scale points per participant, which indicates that the intervention increased quality of life. We also detected a significant baseline‐adjusted difference of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.05‐0.40, p=0.014) between the groups in the score on the “presence of meaning” subscale of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, corresponding to a mean change of 1.1 scale points per participant. We found an incremental gain of 0.0142 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs) (95% credible interval: 0.0059 to 0.0226) and a £178 incremental increase in cost (95% credible interval: –£154 to £455) per participant, generating an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of £12,526 per QALY compared with usual care. This was lower than the £20,000 per QALY threshold used by the National Health Service in England, indicating that the intervention would be a cost‐effective use of health service resources. In the subgroup analysis including participants who had used specialist mental health services at baseline, the intervention both reduced cost (–£98, 95% credible interval: –£606 to £309) and improved QALYs (0.0165, 95% credible interval: 0.0057 to 0.0273) per participant as compared to usual care. We conclude that the NEON Intervention is an effective and cost‐effective new intervention for people experiencing non‐psychotic mental health problems.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17238617 and 20515545
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
World Psychiatry
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs65156844
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.21176