Back to Search Start Over

AI-based automation of enrollment criteria and endpoint assessment in clinical trials in liver diseases

Authors :
Iyer, Janani S.
Juyal, Dinkar
Le, Quang
Shanis, Zahil
Pokkalla, Harsha
Pouryahya, Maryam
Pedawi, Aryan
Stanford-Moore, S. Adam
Biddle-Snead, Charles
Carrasco-Zevallos, Oscar
Lin, Mary
Egger, Robert
Hoffman, Sara
Elliott, Hunter
Leidal, Kenneth
Myers, Robert P.
Chung, Chuhan
Billin, Andrew N.
Watkins, Timothy R.
Patterson, Scott D.
Resnick, Murray
Wack, Katy
Glickman, Jon
Burt, Alastair D.
Loomba, Rohit
Sanyal, Arun J.
Glass, Ben
Montalto, Michael C.
Taylor-Weiner, Amaro
Wapinski, Ilan
Beck, Andrew H.
Source :
Nature Medicine; October 2024, Vol. 30 Issue: 10 p2914-2923, 10p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Clinical trials in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, formerly known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis) require histologic scoring for assessment of inclusion criteria and endpoints. However, variability in interpretation has impacted clinical trial outcomes. We developed an artificial intelligence-based measurement (AIM) tool for scoring MASH histology (AIM-MASH). AIM-MASH predictions for MASH Clinical Research Network necroinflammation grades and fibrosis stages were reproducible (κ= 1) and aligned with expert pathologist consensus scores (κ= 0.62–0.74). The AIM-MASH versus consensus agreements were comparable to average pathologists for MASH Clinical Research Network scores (82% versus 81%) and fibrosis (97% versus 96%). Continuous scores produced by AIM-MASH for key histological features of MASH correlated with mean pathologist scores and noninvasive biomarkers and strongly predicted progression-free survival in patients with stage 3 (P< 0.0001) and stage 4 (P= 0.03) fibrosis. In a retrospective analysis of the ATLAS trial (NCT03449446), responders receiving study treatment showed a greater continuous change in fibrosis compared with placebo (P= 0.02). Overall, these results suggest that AIM-MASH may assist pathologists in histologic review of MASH clinical trials, reducing inter-rater variability on trial outcomes and offering a more sensitive and reproducible measure of patient responses.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10788956 and 1546170X
Volume :
30
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Nature Medicine
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs67107239
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03172-7