Back to Search Start Over

Phase 3, Randomized, 20-Month Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Bimatoprost Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension (ARTEMIS 2)

Authors :
Bacharach, Jason
Tatham, Andrew
Ferguson, Gloria
Belalcázar, Sandra
Thieme, Hagen
Goodkin, Margot L.
Chen, Michelle Y.
Guo, Qiang
Liu, Jeen
Robinson, Michael R.
Bejanian, Marina
Wirta, David L.
Alezzandrini, Arturo
Bercovich, Gabriel
Deromedis, Pablo
Furno Sola, Federico
Gentile, Carolina
Lerner, Simon
Lupinacci, Anahi
Zeolite, Carlos
Birt, Catherine
Crichton, Andrew
Gagne, Sebastien
Giunta, Michael
Harasymowycz, Paul
Jinapriya, Delan
Nicolela, Marcelo
Nixon, Donald
Saurel, Patrick
Yan, David
Yuen, Darana
Arango, Santiago
Martinez, Alexander
Parra Restrepo, Juan C.
Korda, Vladimir
Kadlecova, Jana
Svacinova, Jitka
Khairy, Hany
El Ibiary, Hani
El Sanabary, Zeinab
Bell, Katharina
Greslechner, Roman
Koch, Jöerg
Lorenz, Katrin
Oberacher-Velten, Isabel
Schmickler, Stefanie
Schuart, Claudie
Bandello, Francesco
Cagini, Carlos
Figus, Michele
Mastropasqua, Leonardo
Rossetti, Luca
Uva, Maurizio G.
Thayanithi, Sandragasu
Wells, Anthony
Husain, Rahat
Koh, Victor
Lim, Dawn
Tin, Aung
Gous, Petrus
Venter, Lynette
Kee, Changwon
Kook, Michael
Park, Ki-Ho
Eraslan, Muhsin
Kayikcioglu, Ozcan
Yildirim, Nilgun
Bourne, Rupert R. A.
Choudhary, Anshoo
Cordeiro, Francesca
Dubois, Vincent
Kirwan, James
Lim, Sheng
Martin, Keith
Nithy, Antony
Prabhu, Avinash
Amir, Ahmad
Barnebey, Howard
Beck, Allen
Bergstrom, Lance
Borisuth, Navaneet
Branch, James D.
Briggs, Jonathan
Bylsma, Stephen
Chang, Peter
Christie, William
Cotter, Frank
Depenbusch, Michael
Goldberg, Damien F.
Greiner, Jack
Gupta, Shailesh
Gutmark, Ron
Han, Ying
Heersink, Sebastian
Kahook, Malik
Khouri, Albert
Kim, Joshua
Kushnick, Howard
Lin, Christopher
Luchs, Jodi
Maharaj, Arindel
Mansberger, Steven L.
Mares, Frank
Miller-Ellis, Eydie
Modi, Satish
Paul, Matthew
Pitha, Ian
Saltzmann, Robert
Sato, Michelle
Savestsky, Michael
Segal, Bruce
Segal, Zachary
Serle, Janet
Sherwood, Mark
Singh, Inder
Smith, Stephen E.
Song, Julia
Sorenson, Robert
Tenkman, Lawrence
Tekwani, Navin
Tubbs, Carl
Tyson, Farrell
Vizzeri, Gianmarco
Vold, Steven
Vu, Qui
Warren, Kimberly S.
Wirta, David
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer, 2021.

Abstract

Objective-\ud \ud To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).\ud \ud Methods-\ud \ud This randomized, 20-month, multicenter, masked, parallel-group, phase 3 trial enrolled 528 patients with OAG or OHT and an open iridocorneal angle inferiorly in the study eye. Study eyes were administered 10 or 15 µg bimatoprost implant on day 1, week 16, and week 32, or twice-daily topical timolol maleate 0.5%. Primary endpoints were IOP and IOP change from baseline through week 12. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and corneal endothelial cell density (CECD).\ud \ud Results-\ud \ud Both 10 and 15 µg bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint of noninferiority to timolol in IOP lowering through 12 weeks. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 6.2–7.4, 6.5–7.8, and 6.1–6.7 mmHg through week 12 in the 10 µg implant, 15 µg implant, and timolol groups, respectively. IOP lowering was similar after the second and third implant administrations. Probabilities of requiring no IOP-lowering treatment for 1 year after the third administration were 77.5% (10 µg implant) and 79.0% (15 µg implant). The most common TEAE was conjunctival hyperemia, typically temporally associated with the administration procedure. Corneal TEAEs of interest (primarily corneal endothelial cell loss, corneal edema, and corneal touch) were more frequent with the 15 than the 10 µg implant and generally were reported after repeated administrations. Loss in mean CECD from baseline to month 20 was ~ 5% in 10 µg implant-treated eyes and ~ 1% in topical timolol-treated eyes. Visual field progression (change in the mean deviation from baseline) was reduced in the 10 µg implant group compared with the timolol group.\ud \ud Conclusions-\ud \ud The results corroborated the previous phase 3 study of the bimatoprost implant. The bimatoprost implant met the primary endpoint and effectively lowered IOP. The majority of patients required no additional treatment for 12 months after the third administration. The benefit-risk assessment favored the 10 over the 15 µg implant. Studies evaluating other administration regimens with reduced risk of corneal events are ongoing. The bimatoprost implant has the potential to improve adherence and reduce treatment burden in glaucoma.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11791950
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.core.ac.uk....fc3bb66f4c217ab6b8bce8970ce62627