Back to Search Start Over

Venetoclax plus bendamustine-rituximab or bendamustine-obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: final results of a phase 1b study (GO28440)

Authors :
Stilgenbauer, Stephan
Morschhauser, Franck
Wendtner, Clemens-Martin
Cartron, Guillaume
Hallek, Michael
Eichhorst, Barbara
Kozloff, Mark
Giever, Thomas
Lozanski, Gerard
Jiang, Yanwen
Huang, Huang
Pignataro, Daniela
Schary, William
Humphrey, Kathryn
Mobasher, Mehrdad
Salles, Gilles
Universität Ulm - Ulm University [Ulm, Allemagne]
Groupe de Recherche sur les formes Injectables et les Technologies Associées - ULR 7365 (GRITA)
Université de Lille-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
Université de Montpellier (UM)
University Hospital of Cologne [Cologne]
The University of Chicago Medicine [Chicago]
Medical College of Wisconsin [Milwaukee] (MCW)
Ohio State University [Columbus] (OSU)
Genentech, Inc. [San Francisco]
F. Hoffmann-La Roche [Basel]
Roche Products Ltd
Abbvie Inc. [North Chicago]
Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)
Université de Lyon
Source :
Haematologica, Haematologica, In press, ⟨10.3324/haematol.2020.261107⟩, Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation, In press, ⟨10.3324/haematol.2020.261107⟩
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2021.

Abstract

International audience; Venetoclax (Ven), an orally administered, potent BCL-2 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in combination with rituximab (R) or obinutuzumab (G). Our aim was to investigate the addition of bendamustine (B) to these Ven-containing regimens in relapsed/refractory (R/R) or first-line (1L) CLL. This multi-arm, non-randomized, open-label, phase 1b study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/tolerability of Ven with BR/BG, with 3+3 dose-escalation followed by safety expansion. Patients received Ven (schedule A) or BR/BG first (schedule B) to compare safety and determine dose/schedule for expansion. Six Ven-BR/-BG cycles were to be administered, then Ven monotherapy until disease progression (R/R) or fixed-duration 1-year treatment (1L). Overall, 33 R/R and 50 1L patients were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed (doses 100–400-mg), and the MTD was not reached. Safety was similar between schedules; no tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) occurred during dose-finding. Schedule B and Ven 400-mg were chosen for expansion. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia: R/R 64%, 1L Ven-BR 85%, 1L Ven-BG 55%. Grade 3–4 infection rate was: R/R 27%, 1L Ven-BR 0%, 1L Ven-BG 27%. During expansion, one clinical and two laboratory TLS cases occurred. Fewer than half the patients completed six combination therapy cycles with all study drugs; rates of bendamustine discontinuation were high. Overall response rate was 91% in R/R and 100% in 1L patients (16/49 1L patients received Ven for >1 year). In conclusion, addition of bendamustine to Ven-R/-G increased toxicity without apparent efficacy benefit.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03906078 and 15928721
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Haematologica, Haematologica, In press, ⟨10.3324/haematol.2020.261107⟩, Haematologica, Ferrata Storti Foundation, In press, ⟨10.3324/haematol.2020.261107⟩
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..1ad6b65b6e39771e118d1efeaa44af0f
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2020.261107⟩