Back to Search Start Over

The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990-2018

Authors :
Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana
McGrath, Matthew
Andrew, Robbie
Peylin, Philippe
Peters, Glen
Ciais, Philippe
Broquet, Gregoire
Tubiello, Francesco
Gerbig, Christoph
Pongratz, Julia
Janssens-Maenhout, Greet
Grassi, Giacomo
Nabuurs, Gert-Jan
Regnier, Pierre
Lauerwald, Ronny
Kuhnert, Matthias
Balkovič, Juraj
Schelhaas, Mart-Jan
Denier Van Der Gon, Hugo
Solazzo, Efisio
Qiu, Chunjing
Pilli, Roberto
Konovalov, Igor
Houghton, Richard
Günther, Dirk
Perugini, Lucia
Crippa, Monica
Ganzenmüller, Raphael
Luijkx, Ingrid
Smith, Pete
Munassar, Saqr
Thompson, Rona
Conchedda, Giulia
Monteil, Guillaume
Scholze, Marko
Karstens, Ute
Brockmann, Patrick
Dolman, Albertus Johannes
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU)
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Center for International Climate and Environmental Research [Oslo] (CICERO)
University of Oslo (UiO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [Rome, Italie] (FAO)
Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (MPI-BGC)
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M)
European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC)
Wageningen Environmental Research (Alterra)
Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Ecologie fonctionnelle et écotoxicologie des agroécosystèmes (ECOSYS)
AgroParisTech-Université Paris-Saclay-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE)
European Research Council Synergy project
French National Research Agency (ANR)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Ludwig-Maximilians University [Munich] (LMU)
Earth and Climate
Earth Sciences
Source :
Earth System Science Data, Earth System Science Data, Copernicus Publications, 2021, 13 (5), pp.2363-2406. ⟨10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021⟩, Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13 (5), pp.2363-2406. ⟨10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021⟩, Earth System Science Data 13 (2021) 5, Petrescu, A M R, McGrath, M J, Andrew, R M, Peylin, P, Peters, G P, Ciais, P, Broquet, G, Tubiello, F N, Gerbig, C, Pongratz, J, Janssens-Maenhout, G, Grassi, G, Nabuurs, G J, Regnier, P, Lauerwald, R, Kuhnert, M, Balkovič, J, Schelhaas, M J, van der Gon, H A C D, Solazzo, E, Qiu, C, Pilli, R, Konovalov, I B, Houghton, R A, Günther, D, Perugini, L, Crippa, M, Ganzenmüller, R, Luijkx, I T, Smith, P, Munassar, S, Thompson, R L, Conchedda, G, Monteil, G, Scholze, M, Karstens, U, Brockmann, P & Dolman, A J 2021, ' The consolidated European synthesis of CO 2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990-2018 ', Earth System Science Data, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2363-2406 . https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, Earth System Science Data, 13(5), 2363-2406, Earth System Science Data, 13 (5, Earth System Science Data, 13(5), 2363-2406. Copernicus Publications
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Reliable quantification of the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), including that of their trends and uncertainties, is essential to monitoring the progress in mitigating anthropogenic emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. This study provides a consolidated synthesis of estimates for all anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of CO2 for the European Union and UK (EU27 + UK), derived from a combination of state-of-the-art bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) data sources and models. Given the wide scope of the work and the variety of datasets involved, this study focuses on identifying essential questions which need to be answered to properly understand the differences between various datasets, in particular with regards to the less-well-characterized fluxes from managed ecosystems. The work integrates recent emission inventory data, process-based ecosystem model results, data-driven sector model results and inverse modeling estimates over the period 1990-2018. BU and TD products are compared with European national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) reported under the UNFCCC in 2019, aiming to assess and understand the differences between approaches. For the uncertainties in NGHGIs, we used the standard deviation obtained by varying parameters of inventory calculations, reported by the member states following the IPCC Guidelines. Variation in estimates produced with other methods, like atmospheric inversion models (TD) or spatially disaggregated inventory datasets (BU), arises from diverse sources including within-model uncertainty related to parameterization as well as structural differences between models. In comparing NGHGIs with other approaches, a key source of uncertainty is that related to different system boundaries and emission categories (CO2 fossil) and the use of different land use definitions for reporting emissions from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities (CO2 land). At the EU27 + UK level, the NGHGI (2019) fossil CO2 emissions (including cement production) account for 2624 Tg CO2 in 2014 while all the other seven bottom-up sources are consistent with the NGHGIs and report a mean of 2588 (± 463 Tg CO2). The inversion reports 2700 Tg CO2 (± 480 Tg CO2), which is well in line with the national inventories. Over 2011-2015, the CO2 land sources and sinks from NGHGI estimates report-90 Tg C yr-1 ± 30 Tg C yr-1 while all other BU approaches report a mean sink of-98 Tg C yr-1 (± 362 Tg of C from dynamic global vegetation models only). For the TD model ensemble results, we observe a much larger spread for regional inversions (i.e. mean of 253 Tg C yr-1 ± 400 Tg C yr-1). This concludes that (a) current independent approaches are consistent with NGHGIs and (b) their uncertainty is too large to allow a verification because of model differences and probably also because of the definition of "CO2 flux"obtained from different approaches. The referenced datasets related to figures are visualized.<br />SCOPUS: re.j<br />info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19902018, 18663508, and 18663516
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Earth System Science Data, Earth System Science Data, Copernicus Publications, 2021, 13 (5), pp.2363-2406. ⟨10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021⟩, Earth System Science Data, 2021, 13 (5), pp.2363-2406. ⟨10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021⟩, Earth System Science Data 13 (2021) 5, Petrescu, A M R, McGrath, M J, Andrew, R M, Peylin, P, Peters, G P, Ciais, P, Broquet, G, Tubiello, F N, Gerbig, C, Pongratz, J, Janssens-Maenhout, G, Grassi, G, Nabuurs, G J, Regnier, P, Lauerwald, R, Kuhnert, M, Balkovič, J, Schelhaas, M J, van der Gon, H A C D, Solazzo, E, Qiu, C, Pilli, R, Konovalov, I B, Houghton, R A, Günther, D, Perugini, L, Crippa, M, Ganzenmüller, R, Luijkx, I T, Smith, P, Munassar, S, Thompson, R L, Conchedda, G, Monteil, G, Scholze, M, Karstens, U, Brockmann, P & Dolman, A J 2021, ' The consolidated European synthesis of CO 2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990-2018 ', Earth System Science Data, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 2363-2406 . https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, Earth System Science Data, 13(5), 2363-2406, Earth System Science Data, 13 (5, Earth System Science Data, 13(5), 2363-2406. Copernicus Publications
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..3733119a780a667adb4d6f0966d30156