Back to Search Start Over

Promising nutritional strategies to reduce enteric methane emission from ruminants – a meta-analysis

Authors :
Arndt, Claudia
Hristov, Alexander N.
McClelland, Shelby C.
Kebreab, Ermias
Oh, Joonpyo
Bannink, André
Bayat, Ali R.
Crompton, Les A.
Dijkstra, Jan
Eugène, Maguy
Martin, Cécile
Kreuzer, Michael
McGee, Mark
Reynolds, Christopher K.
Schwarm, Angela
Shingfield, Kevin J
Yáñez-Ruiz, David R.
Yu, Zhongtang
Veneman, J. B.
Newbold, C. James
Centro Agronomico Tropical de Investigacion y Enseñanza (CATIE)
Department of Animal Science
Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)
Penn State System-Penn State System
Colorado State University [Fort Collins] (CSU)
University of California
Livestock Research
Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR)
Natural Resources Institute Finland (LUKE)
School of Agriculture, Policy and Development
University of Reading (UOR)
Animal Nutrition Group
Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 (UMRH)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)
Department of Agricultural Science
University of Naples Federico II
Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Teagasc)
Institute of Agricultural Sciences
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Zurich
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS)
Aberystwyth University
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC)
Department of Animal Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign [Urbana]
University of Illinois System-University of Illinois System
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement
Source :
7. GGAA Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA), 7. GGAA Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA), Aug 2019, Iguazu fos, Brazil. 2019
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

International audience; Decreasing enteric CH4 emissions is important in mitigating the environmental impact of livestock farming. The present meta-analysis examined effects of nutritional mitigation practices on absolute CH4 emissions (g/animal/d) and CH4 yield [g CH4/kg dry matter intake (DMI)] as well as on DMI (kg/d), average daily gain (kg/d), milk production (kg/d), and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (%). The database for this analysis consisted of over 400 studies. Only studies that reported statistical variance were included in the analysis (295 studies and 644 treatment mean comparisons). A standard random-effects meta-analysis weighted by inverse variance was carried out. The effects of the standardized mean difference (SMD) were classified as small (≤-0.2 and >-0.5), medium (≤-0.5 and >-0.8), and large (≤-0.8). Of the analyzed treatments, inclusion of chemical inhibitors, electron sinks, and lipids had a large effect on absolute CH4 emissions (-2.1 ± 0.5, -1.6 ± 0.2, and -1.3 ± 0.2 SMD ± SE, respectively; P 0.15), whereas electron sinks and lipids led to a small decrease in DMI (-0.2 ± 0.1, and -0.4 ± 0.1 SMD ± SE, respectively; P ≤0.01) without affecting animal productivity (P >0.05). Although these nutritional strategies effectively reduced CH4 emissions without compromising animal productivity, their adoption will largely depend on their economic feasibility.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
7. GGAA Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA), 7. GGAA Greenhouse Gases & Animal Agriculture Conference (GGAA), Aug 2019, Iguazu fos, Brazil. 2019
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..4523f9546b86ce44a2ea39032eae76f7