Back to Search Start Over

Effects of floor cooling on behavior and physiology of lactating sows during acute heat stress

Authors :
Parois, Séverine
Cabezon, Francisco
Schinckel, Allan
Johnson, Jay
Stwalley, Robert
Marchant-Forde, J.N.
Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage [Rennes] (PEGASE)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Livestock Behavior Research Unit
USDA-ARS : Agricultural Research Service
Animal Sciences
Research Institute for Agricultural, Fisheries and Food (ILVO)
Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering [Gainesville] (UF|ABE)
Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences [Gainesville] (UF|IFAS)
University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF)-University of Florida [Gainesville] (UF)
Source :
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers Media, 2018, 5, ⟨10.3389/fvets.2018.00223⟩, Frontiers in Veterinary Science (5), . (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2018.

Abstract

International audience; Much U.S. swine production is in Köppen climate types classified as ‘hot-summer humid continental’ and ‘humid subtropical’. As a result, farrowing sows are often exposed to temperatures above their upper critical temperature. This heat stress (HS) can affect sow welfare and productivity and have a negative economic impact. The study objective was to evaluate the impact of a cooling pad on sows’ behavioral and heart rate responses to acute HS. Treatments were randomly allotted to 10 multiparous sows to receive a constant cool water flow of 0.00 (CONTROL, n=4), 0.25 (LOW, n=2), 0.55 (MEDIUM, n=2) or 0.85 (HIGH, n=2) L/min for 100 min and replicated eight times, switching treatments so that each sow was exposed to each treatment. The cooling was initiated 1 hour after the room reached 35°C for 100 min. Eating, drinking and nursing behaviors, postures and heart rate were recorded before heating (Period 1), prior to cooling (Period 2), and during cooling (Period 3). There were no differences between LOW, MEDIUM and HIGH flow rates for any periods on all behavioral and heart rate traits, so data were pooled (COOLED). There were no differences in any of the measures during Periods 1 and 2, except for the ratio of short term to long term heart rate variability (SD1:SD2) with higher values for CONTROL than COOLED sows in Period 2. During Period 3, CONTROL sows changed postures more frequently (11.5±1.6 vs 5.1±1.6 changes per hour), spent more time drinker-pressing/drinking (4.4±0.5 vs 1.4±0.4% of time), standing (6.6±1.7 vs 3.8±1.6% of time), sitting (10.0±1.2 vs 4.0±1.1), less time lying (83.0±1.8 vs 92.0±1.7% of time), especially lying laterally (62.0±5.6 vs 75.0±5.3% of time), than sows in all three cooling treatments (all P < 0.001). Heart rate during Period 3 was lower for COOLED sows compared to the CONTROL sows (100.2±3.4 vs 119.0±4.0 beat per min, P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
22971769
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Frontiers Media, 2018, 5, ⟨10.3389/fvets.2018.00223⟩, Frontiers in Veterinary Science (5), . (2018)
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..5e6ba6007b973e638acc666db8fb00e5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00223⟩