Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of the metabolic effects of ritonavir-boosted darunavir or atazanavir versus raltegravir, and the impact of ritonavir plasma exposure: ACTG 5257

Authors :
Ofotokun, Ighovwerha
Na, Lumine H
Landovitz, Raphael J
Ribaudo, Heather J
McComsey, Grace A
Godfrey, Catherine
Aweeka, Francesca
Cohn, Susan E
Sagar, Manish
Kuritzkes, Daniel R
Brown, Todd T
Patterson, Kristine B
Para, Michael F
Leavitt, Randi Y
Villasis-Keever, Angelina
Baugh, Bryan P
Lennox, Jeffrey L
Currier, Judith S
AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5257 Team
Source :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol 60, iss 12
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
eScholarship, University of California, 2015.

Abstract

BackgroundMetabolic effects following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vary by regimen type. Changes in metabolic effects were assessed following cART in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5257 study, and correlated with plasma ritonavir trough concentrations (C24).MethodsTreatment-naive adult subjects were randomized to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir, or raltegravir-based cART. Changes in lipids and other metabolic outcomes over time were estimated. Differences between arms were estimated with 97.5% confidence intervals and compared using pairwise Student t tests. Associations between ritonavir C24 and lipid changes at week 48 were evaluated via linear regression.ResultsAnalyses included 1797 subjects with baseline fasting data. Baseline lipid profiles and metabolic syndrome rates (approximately 21%) were similar across arms. Comparable increases occurred in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the boosted protease inhibitors (PIs); each PI had greater increases relative to raltegravir (all P ≤ .001 at week 96). Metabolic syndrome incident rates by week 96 (approximately 22%) were not different across arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different by arm (P = .89) (median, 69 ng/mL and 74 ng/mL in the atazanavir and darunavir arms, respectively) and were not associated with changes in lipid measures (all P > .1).ConclusionsRaltegravir produced the most favorable lipid profile. Metabolic syndrome rates were high at baseline and increased to the same degree in all arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different in the PI arms and had no relationship with the modest but comparable increases in lipids observed with either atazanavir or darunavir. The long-term clinical significance of the lipid changes noted with the PIs relative to raltegravir deserves further evaluation.Clinical trials registrationNCT 00811954.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, vol 60, iss 12
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..62319c763edf8b4cfd14eed50ef1620d