Back to Search Start Over

Does scientific publication need a peer consensus? Commentary on Stodolsky on consensus-journals

Authors :
Oullier, O
Michel-Kerjan, E
Laboratoire de psychologie cognitive (LPC)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)
Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Psycoloquy, Psycoloquy, American Psychological Association, 2001, 12 (22), pp.1-4, Psycoloquy, 2001, 12 (22), pp.1-4
Publication Year :
2001
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2001.

Abstract

International audience; We would like to discuss Stodolsky's ``consensus journals'' model (Stodolsky, 1990; 1992). We will quickly show that the context in which such a model can be applied has to be precisely defined. Examples will then be given to illustrate our views and show both the scientific and pragmatic limits of this proposal. For us, Stodolsky's attempt to automatize electronic publication could be considered as an additional approach for article submission rather than one which will replace those existing ones.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10550143
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Psycoloquy, Psycoloquy, American Psychological Association, 2001, 12 (22), pp.1-4, Psycoloquy, 2001, 12 (22), pp.1-4
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..643b691e360aff537301e1bc3c41a028