Back to Search Start Over

On-line breath analysis of volatile organic compounds as a method for colorectal cancer detection

Authors :
Zambrana, Francisco
Herrero Langreo, Ana
Vidal de Miguel, Guillermo
Bailador del Pozo, Gonzalo
Criado Hidalgo, Ernesto
Sánchez Ávila, María del Carmen
Marquina, Isabel
Sereno, María
Gómez Raposo, César
López Gomez, Miriam
Merino, María
Aguayo, Cristina
Álvarez Gallego, Mario
García Olmo, Damián
Erdozain Sosa, José Carlos
Comas, Carmen
Manceñidos, Noemí
Feliu, Jaime
Casado, Enrique
Source :
2012 ASCO Annual Meeting | 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting | 01/06/2012-05/06/2012 | Chicago, USA, Archivo Digital UPM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación (UPM), 2012.

Abstract

Background: Analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath is an emerging approach for cancer diagnosis, but little is known about its potential use as a biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC). We investigated whether a combination of VOCs could distinct CRC patients from healthy volunteers. Methods: In a pilot study, we prospectively analyzed breath exhalations of 38 CRC patient and 43 healthy controls all scheduled for colonoscopy, older than 50 in the average-risk category. The samples were ionized and analyzed using a Secondary ElectroSpray Ionization (SESI) coupled with a Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (SESI-MS). After a minimum of 2 hours fasting, volunteers deeply exhaled into the system. Each test requires three soft exhalations and takes less than ten minutes. No breath condensate or collection are required and VOCs masses are detected in real time, also allowing for a spirometric profile to be analyzed along with the VOCs. A new sampling system precludes ambient air from entering the system, so background contamination is reduced by an overall factor of ten. Potential confounding variables from the patient or the environment that could interfere with results were analyzed. Results: 255 VOCs, with masses ranging from 30 to 431 Dalton have been identified in the exhaled breath. Using a classification technique based on the ROC curve for each VOC, a set of 9 biomarkers discriminating the presence of CRC from healthy volunteers was obtained, showing an average recognition rate of 81.94%, a sensitivity of 87.04% and specificity of 76.85%. Conclusions: A combination of cualitative and cuantitative analysis of VOCs in the exhaled breath could be a powerful diagnostic tool for average-risk CRC population. These results should be taken with precaution, as many endogenous or exogenous contaminants could interfere as confounding variables. On-line analysis with SESI-MS is less time-consuming and doesn’t need sample preparation. We are recruiting in a new pilot study including breath cleaning procedures and spirometric analysis incorporated into the postprocessing algorithms, to better control for confounding variables.

Subjects

Subjects :
Telecomunicaciones
Mecánica

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
2012 ASCO Annual Meeting | 2012 ASCO Annual Meeting | 01/06/2012-05/06/2012 | Chicago, USA, Archivo Digital UPM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..93f9d659d839122dd58e8386b8c8d9b9