Back to Search Start Over

ADDENDUM to the scientific opinion SCCS/1613/19 on the safety of aluminium in cosmetic products (lipstick) - Submission II - SCCS/1626/20 - Addendum (lipstick) – preliminary version

Authors :
Bernauer, Ulrike
Bodin, Laurent
Chaudhry, Qasim
Coenraads, Pieter J.
Dusinska, Maria
Ezendam, Janine
Gaffet, Eric
Galli, Corrado Lodovico
Granum, Berit Brunstad
Panteri, Eirini
Rogiers, Vera
Rousselle, Christophe
Stepnik, Maciej
Vanhaecke, Tamara
Wijnhoven, Susan
Koutsodimou, Aglaia
Uter, Wolfgang
German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment [Berlin] (BfR)
Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)
University of Chester
University Medical Center Groningen [Groningen] (UMCG)
Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment [Bilthoven] (RIVM)
Institut Jean Lamour (IJL)
Université de Lorraine (UL)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS) (SCCS)
University of Milan
Norwegian Institute of Public Health [Oslo] (NIPH)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Direction de l'Evaluation des Risques (DER)
Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l'alimentation, de l'environnement et du travail (ANSES)
Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine
Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS / EC)
Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS, EC)
Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université de Lorraine (UL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Università degli Studi di Milano = University of Milan (UNIMI)
Gaffet, Eric
Source :
Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS / EC). 2020, Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS, EC), Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS / EC)., 2020, Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS, EC)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

International audience; The SCCS concludes the following: 1.In light of the new data provided, does the SCCS consider Aluminium safe when used in lipsticks up to a maximum concentration of 14%? In the event that the estimated exposure to Aluminium from lipsticks of cosmetic products is found to be o concern, SCCS is asked to recommend safe concentration limits. In the light of the new data provided, the SCCS considers that the use of aluminium compounds is safe at the following equivalent aluminium concentrations up to: 6.25% in non-spray deodorants or non-spray antiperspirants10.60% in spray deodorants or spray antiperspirants2.65% in toothpaste and14% in lipstick2.Does the SCCS have any further scientific concerns regarding the use of Aluminium substances in cosmetic products taking into account the newly submitted information on aggregate exposure from cosmetics? The SCCS considers that the systemic exposure to aluminium via daily applications of cosmetic products does not add significantly to the systemic body burden of aluminium from other sources. Exposure to aluminium may also occur from sources other than cosmetic products, and a major source of aluminium in the population is the diet. This assessment has not taken into account the daily dietary intake of aluminium.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS / EC). 2020, Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS, EC), Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS / EC)., 2020, Scientific Committee for Consumer Safety (SCCS, EC)
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..f96b68f39294fa9e6f7983279cdb3c40