Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy of Rokitamycin (RKM) and Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the Treatment of Campylobacter Enteritis by a Double-Blind Method

Authors :
Mitsuo OBANA
Isao TOMIZAWA
Yoshihiko TAKIZAWA
Yoshiro NITTA
Hiroko SAGARA
Takehisa SEO
Junichi SATO
Takafumi TSUNODA
Satomi OTA
Akira MACHII
Yoshitaka NAKAMURA
Teiko KATANO
Misako MURATA
Kenji OHNISHI
Tsuyoshi YAMAGUCHI
Gohta MASUDA
Masayoshi NEGISHI
Atsushi AJISAWA
Mitsuo KITAHARA
Keiko LEE
Shoichiro IRIMAJIRI
Yasuo MATSUOKA
Fumio MATSUMOTO
Takeo IMAI
Iwao SAKURAI
Takayuki TAKAHASHI
Fukiko AMANO
Akira MURAMOTO
Chie NAKAMURA
Hideyuki KANOU
Jun NARUSE
Yong-ki KIM
Yasuhiko INAMOTO
Mitsuru AKAO
Yoshihiro SAKAUE
Shiro HOSODA
Tadao BAMBA
Kenichi TATEWAKI
Kunio YOSHIKAWA
Iwao MATSUSHITA
Kenji FUSE
Masaya SASAKI
Kuniko KURISU
Masao NAKAGAWA
Katsuyuki KITOH
Toshio KAWAJIRI
Minoru KIZU
Takehiko SHIOMI
Sadao KATAOKA
Yoshio KAWAGUCHI
Akira FUKUMOTO
Kazuya TAMURA
Masami MURAI
Michio TANAKA
Osamu KURIMURA
Yoshio MATSUBARA
Makoto SAITO
Yatsuka IMAGAWA
Rintaro NAKAYA
Sankichi HORIUCHI
Yoshio INAGAKI
Source :
Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. 65:1165-1182
Publication Year :
1991
Publisher :
The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases, 1991.

Abstract

The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three divided doses for 5 days. Of 223 cases studied, 106 cases were diagnosed as Campylobacter enteritis. Ninety cases (RKM group: 50, OFLX group: 40) except for 16 excluded or drop-out cases were analysed. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any background factors. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 88 cases (RKM group: 48, OFLX group: 40). The results obtained were as follows: 1. In a total of 82 strains of Campylobacter jejuni/coli (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 40), the bacteriological efficacy rate of RKM (95.2%) was superior to that of OFLX (70.0%) with a significant difference (p = 0.006). 2. In 76 symptomatic patients (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 34) on the day of the beginning of drug administration, the clinical efficacy rate was 97.6% in the RKM group and 85.3% in the OFLX group with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. In 88 evaluable patients, the global clinical efficacy rate of RKM (95.8%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). 4. Side effect was observed in 1 (1.9%) of the 54 patients in the RKM group and none of the 44 patients in the OFLX group. Slightly abnormal laboratory findings were seen in 4 (10.8%) of the 37 patients treated with RKM and 3 (9.7%) of the 31 patients treated with OFLX, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 88 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of RKM (91.7%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.01). From these results, RKM is considered to be a very useful agent for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis.

Details

ISSN :
1884569X and 03875911
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........0e54c9cdd188b192f74928343998ea6e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.65.1165