Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay platform
- Source :
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 61:1123-1130
- Publication Year :
- 2023
- Publisher :
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH, 2023.
-
Abstract
- Objectives To describe a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test that is based on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay (LiCA®), and to validate its analytical characteristics and clinical agreement on detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection against the reference molecular test. Methods Analytical performance was validated and detection limits were determined using different types of nucleocapsid protein samples. 798-pair anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from hospitalized patients and asymptomatic screening individuals. Agreement between LiCA® antigen and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was evaluated. Results Repeatability and within-lab precision were 1.6–2.3%. The C5∼C95 interval was −5.1–4.6% away from C50. Detection limits in average (SD) were 325 (±141) U/mL on the national reference panel, 0.07 (±0.04) TCID50/mL on active viral cultures, 0.27 (±0.09) pg/mL on recombinant nucleocapsid proteins and 1.07 (±1.01) TCID50/mL on inactivated viral suspensions, respectively. LiCA detected a median of 374-fold (IQR 137–643) lower levels of the viral antigen than comparative rapid tests. As reference to the rRT-PCR method, overall sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 97.5% (91.4–99.7%) and 99.9% (99.2–100%), respectively. Total agreement between both methods was 99.6% (98.7–99.9%) with Cohen’s kappa 0.98 (0.96–1). A positive detection rate of 100% (95.4–100%) was obtained as Ct≤37.8. Conclusions The LiCA® system provides an exceptionally high-sensitivity and fully automated platform for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swabs. The assay may have high potential use for large-scale population screening and surveillance of COVID-19 as an alternative to the rRT-PCR test.
- Subjects :
- Biochemistry (medical)
Clinical Biochemistry
General Medicine
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14374331 and 14346621
- Volume :
- 61
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........156924e48bc10a06db666b6ed54ab11b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-1039