Back to Search Start Over

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-up of Primary Vaginal Cancer

Authors :
Aradhana M. Venkatesan
Tamer Said
Stella K. Kang
Gaiane M. Rauch
OB Imaging
Esma A. Akin
Expert Panel on Gyn
Chenchan Huang
Carlin Hauck
Nicole Hindman
Erica B. Stein
Aoife Kilcoyne
Ravi V. Gottumukkala
Katherine E. Maturen
Atul B. Shinagare
Rajmohan Paspulati
Namita Khanna
Source :
Journal of the American College of Radiology. 18:S442-S455
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Primary vaginal cancer is rare, comprising 1% to 2% of gynecologic malignancies and 20% of all malignancies involving the vagina. More frequently, the vagina is involved secondarily by direct invasion from malignancies originating in adjacent organs or by metastases from other pelvic or extrapelvic primary malignancies. Data on the use of imaging in vaginal cancer are sparse. Insights are derived from the study of imaging in cervical cancer and have reasonable generalizability to vaginal cancer due to similar tumor biology. Given the trend toward definitive chemoradiation for both cancers in all but early stage lesions, principles of postchemoradiation tumor response evaluation are largely analogous. Accordingly, many of the recommendations outlined here are informed by principles translated from the literature on cervical cancer. For pretreatment assessment of local tumor burden and in the case of recurrent vaginal cancer, MRI is the preferred imaging modality. PET/CT has demonstrated utility for the detection of nodal metastatic and unexpected distant metastatic disease. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Details

ISSN :
15461440
Volume :
18
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........195fa72d5634a412393ecd245cfb91a3
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.011