Back to Search Start Over

Frequent Adverse Drug Reactions, and Medication Groups under Suspicion

Authors :
Eva Alešik
Matthias Schmid
Bernhardt Sachs
Diana Dubrall
Norbert Paeschke
Julia C. Stingl
Source :
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international.
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Deutscher Arzte-Verlag GmbH, 2018.

Abstract

Background The adverse drug reaction database of the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut fur Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, BfArM) contains reports of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) that are spon- taneously submitted by physicians, pharmacists, or patients. The aim of the present study was a descriptive analysis of all of these spontaneous reports. Methods 345 662 spontaneously submitted reports were analyzed with respect to the number of reports per year, the sources of the reports, demographic variables, the most commonly reported ADRs, and the drug classes most commonly suspected. Results The number of reports submitted spontaneously each year has grown steadily since 1978. At the least detailed level of analysis, "drugs for the treatment of nervous system disorders" were the most common class of drugs under suspicion of causing the reported adverse drug reactions (23.1%). In a more detailed analysis by therapeutic subgroup, the three subgroups most commonly reported as suspected of causing side effects were antithrombotic agents, systemic antibiotics, and psycholeptics-causing thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and drug dependency as the most frequently reported ADRs, respectively. The order of drug classes most commonly causing ADRs differed markedly between the physicians' reports (diazepines, fluoroquinolones, heparins) and the patients' reports (interferons, anti- thrombotic drugs, selective immunosuppressant drugs). Patients more commonly reported subjectively perceived ADRs, while physicians more commonly reported findings or diagnoses that require medical expertise. Conclusion The increasing number of spontaneous reports is mainly due to reports forwarded from pharmaceutical companies to the BfArM. This, in turn, is probably a result of increasingly strict legal reporting requirements in Germany. The detected differences between physicians' and patients' ADR reports can be taken to indicate that patients should be more specifically informed and questioned about potential ADRs. By reporting adverse drug reactions, physicians may improve drug safety.

Details

ISSN :
18660452
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Deutsches Ärzteblatt international
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........1b115f450824ad945f770965eb9e06f4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0393